Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Ninety-Eight Percent Leased

According to an anonymous poster in a previous Riverpark thread this empty area is 98% leased and scheduled to start construction in 7 months. I guess I was wrong to doubt the power of the Oxnard name.

25 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:07 PM

    My first Murst! Sucks to be yuo

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:07 PM

    Second and spelling correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this the same type of number fudging the condo tower builders in downtown Sac are/were playing?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:12 PM

    I see a MURST but no FIRST. It's mine!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sure it is. But probably on contingency terms.

    The retail players will lock up their slots and ensure that competitors can't get in. If the place never gets built, it doesn't cost them a thing. If the place does get built, usually some of the lease amount is revenue share, so even if it bombs, it doesn't cost them too much. And usually there are other contingencies attached to it, like getting adjacent business or residential properties done or occupied.

    Getting a smart retailer to put in a little bit up front with limited downside and lots of "outs" isn't all that hard most of the time.

    -btc

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ratlab,
    The usual phrase is "on the pinks" meaning that you can't really make a binding lease until the certificates of occupancy are in hand. Until then the 98% is an interest list. To be sure tere are a few serious tenants in mind but there's no way the local economy can support anything except the population adjusted Trader Joe's, Starbucks, Old Navy, Jamba Juice, Macaroni Grille, AM/PM and such that are part of the urbanscape regardless.

    ReplyDelete
  7. BTC,
    I'd like to thank you. Your recent posts have been outstanding.

    ReplyDelete
  8. So, Rob...I have a feeling you've read "Oath Of Fealty"...

    How long until they build a Todos Santos?

    For you non-Larry Niven fans:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_Fealty_%28novel%29

    ReplyDelete
  9. Archologies? Oh, you mean gated communities. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous2:43 PM

    http://www.scatteredass.com/thumblist.php?show=Galina_Ass.jpg


    Here is a pic I found of the uninvolved G. She looks like she is working with a sub-contractor

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous2:44 PM

    http://www.scatteredass.com/thumblist.php?show=CaseyNigelPet_.jpg


    This one is a must for the Caseypedia.

    ReplyDelete
  12. BTC has been eating his Wheaties.

    ReplyDelete
  13. At some point we move on past these.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Rob

    Yes, gated communities, smarty pants. :)

    No, I mean the whole deal - job onsite, cafeteria, buy in, whole family, under one roof.

    And, would you buy in?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mouse And Pencil asked...
    | How long until they build a Todos Santos?

    Rob replied:
    || Archologies? Oh, you mean gated communities. ;-)

    M&P rejoiners:
    Yes, gated communities, smarty pants. :)

    No, I mean the whole deal - job onsite, cafeteria, buy in, whole family, under one roof.


    Oh you mean Microsoft. ;-)

    And, would you buy in?

    Depends on how much they pay me. Seriously though as a public policy gated communities suck big time. The idea of another layer of governance when we have too many in the first place is equally a formula for social dysfunction.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BTC is bored out of his mind today.

    Off to deal with a client's network problems...

    -btc

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous3:05 PM

    About Archologies*, actually rob has a point about 'gated communities'. And, an Archologie takes parts of another of Rob's least favorite concepts: new urbanisim. The later facet being the concept of living by your work, eating by your home (within walking distance)

    * but I think the real challange with Archologies as they were seminal described and tried in AZ or NV is the closed 'eco system' and self-contained food production.

    ReplyDelete
  18. You know, Arcologies always remind me of Biosphere II...which was, of course, overrun by goats and morning glories and crazy ants and bureaucracy.

    In short, a terrible place to live. Heh.

    ReplyDelete
  19. as a public policy gated communities suck big time

    Agreed 100%

    ReplyDelete
  20. While we be hatin': Mello-Roos is a travesty. The worst aspects of capitalism and bureaucracy and governance combined.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Looked up Mello-Roos because I hadn't ever heard of it, and the discussion board was filled with people who had left CA to TX or CO or were going to. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous4:02 PM

    this place is boring

    ReplyDelete
  23. Here's the Folsom, CA equivalent of Riverpark. Infrastructure is finally in, but it just sits there.

    http://folsomtelegraph.com/articles/2006/10/04/news/top_stories/03pal.txt

    ReplyDelete
  24. Lest I forget Lent Ranch Marketplace in Elk Grove... notice the dates of these articles and still nothing has been done... I think the courts threw out the city's approval for the mall.

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2000/11/20/story2.html

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2000/12/04/story6.html

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2000/12/11/story4.html

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2001/03/19/daily1.html

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2002/06/10/daily3.html

    ReplyDelete
  25. I guess Lent Ranch was renamed Elk Grove Marketplace in 2005 and planned to open on Oct 17th, 2007. Yeah, like that's going to happen.

    http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2005/06/13/story1.html

    ReplyDelete