![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqe5Dm_mGj-5WJ06Pp8UQOVP6znJ0gARCgd9Ye4bmif-_mmuXjOjsX9UzCO2LgWBs020wsOXW4-RJuW95_UCeSubylMmlxqQo-fbPEDKiQOxWVWG5tFh7IC4wi024pbu9ALI6L/s320/Climate_Change_Science_and_Economics-1.gif)
It may well turn out that proposed cure will be worse than the disease. Thus I have ressurected my decision matrix for those of us who are still on the fence abouit the whole climate thingy.
Robert's Rules for Environmental [In]action:
Important, you may not skip questions. Feel free to substitute the eco-emergency of the moment for "global warming" as all are equal in the eyes of science.
Is there local climate change? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
Is there global climate change? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
Is global climate change bad? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
Is global climate change going to continue? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
Is global climate change controllable? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
Is global climate change influencable by human action? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
Is global climate change worse than the actions required? Yes/No
No: end Don't Know: pause Yes: continue
If you have reached this point on the decision tree you may now proceed to the public plebescite process to determine which radical actions are most popular/acceptable. Somehow the advocates for first world social upheaval seemed to have skipped all these steps.