Showing posts with label Banks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Banks. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Hide the Decline

Hat tip to Cobradriver for this unbelievable practice revealed:


This two-bedroom house at 1857 Prospect St. in Sarasota, bought for $453,900 in 2007, was just resold for $523,900. But the deal was a deed in lieu of foreclosure and no money changed hands. So why would a bank pay nearly $3,700 in stamp taxes?

The Herald Tribune has the story:
C&M had defaulted on a $408,500 mortgage, and Bank of Commerce was claiming its collateral. No money actually changed hands, according to Charles Murphy, the bank's chief executive.

Then why did the bank bother paying nearly $3,700 in documentary stamp taxes to make it look like the property had been sold for $523,900?
...
"The loan balance is the main consideration," Dart said. "That and any unpaid interest."

--------------------
Any questions?

Friday, May 29, 2009

Please God No!

A new low in bankster tricks. This from "Bank of america" despite the Calabasas location. You know, Countrywide's lair. My comments are interspersed.
http://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/index.php?s=43&item=8462
Bank of America Home Loans Announces New Program to Help Municipalities Purchase Bank-Owned Properties
Guidelines for use with new federal Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds


Calabasas, Calif. - As part of its commitment to stabilize communities hardest hit by foreclosures, Bank of America Home Loans has announced new streamlined capabilities for municipalities to purchase properties from its real estate-owned (REO) portfolio. The new guidelines are exclusively for local and state government departments receiving U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) grants, to more easily and quickly acquire foreclosed properties for resale to home buyers or to address other community development needs.

Exclusive? Great a new tier of preferred participants. Bad enough that the RE industry saves the best for their own use now government gets the second bite before the apple gets put on display.
Bank of America is proactively briefing eligible municipalities about the new guidelines, and has dedicated staff to work with the government officials, agencies and their nonprofit designees throughout the entire REO review and purchase process.

Great, more work for public employees in a time of fiscal crisis.

Specifically, the new guidelines offer to NSP grant recipients the following:

“First Look” Purchase Opportunity – Review of Bank of America bank-owned properties before being listed on Multiple Listing Services (MLS) and other public sites.

Multiple Property Purchase Opportunity – The ability to purchase multiple properties in a single transaction.

Individual REO Sales – A dedicated servicing associate at Bank of America to work with the city from start to finish.

Real Time Listings – Private access to a new Web site providing real-time listings of all REO properties owned by the bank. Lists of all REOs within a specific zip code are also available.


Nothing like "private access" to generate transparency.

“Helping our customers stay in their homes is a top priority for Bank of America. However, where unemployment or other situations have made sustaining mortgage payments impossible, and foreclosure inevitable, we are working with communities to help ensure these properties do not negatively impact surrounding home values,” said Steve R. Bailey, national servicing executive. “Our new guidelines help municipalities leverage federal grants to purchase foreclosed properties with greater ease and speed, so they and their nonprofit partners can determine the best use of the properties to meet local needs.”


Government is the only sucker left in the game at these prices.

Bank of America Home Loans services one in five residential mortgages in America. These new guidelines are part of the company’s overall commitment to help preserve homeownership and stabilize communities. This includes modifying mortgage loans for up to 630,000 borrowers over a three-year period, representing more than $100 billion in mortgages; and a $35 million neighborhood preservation and foreclosure prevention package announced last year in grants and low-cost loans/investments to nonprofit organizations for foreclosure prevention counseling and REO purchases. Bank of America also works with nonprofits to help create and offer training programs for cities and local nonprofits in communities impacted by foreclosures to buy REOs.

BAHL is actually the former Countrywide. Say no more, say no more, wink, wink.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

759%!

Seven hundred and fifty nine percent. It doesn't quite roll of the tongue but that's how much California Bank & Trust has in outstanding commercial loans relative to their net worth. Details in this LATimes report.
As commercial loans go bad, it will be particularly hard on regional banks, said Joe Morford, a San Francisco-based analyst for RBC Capital Markets, because their main customers are the small and medium-size businesses whose ranks include many developers.

"They exist for the small-business customer, the real estate developer and the entrepreneur," Morford said, a role that makes their health crucial for the greater economy. Morford has warned investors to be cautious about all three of the biggest L.A. County-based banks: East West, City National, and Cathay General Bancorp of Los Angeles.

Morford said in a report last week that commercial real estate and business lending problems are worrisome at Zions Bancorp, a Salt Lake City lender that is the parent of California Bank & Trust and operates in 10 Western states; and Umpqua Holdings Corp., an Oregon bank that operates from Napa, Calif., to Bellevue, Wash.

Saturday, May 02, 2009

Banks As Homemoaners


Here's the link

We couldn't get them to be responsible lenders but now that they are irresponsible homemoaners we're all over their behavior. This is why banks should never be allowed to get bigger than regional.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Better To Be Lucky

There's an old saying "It is better to be luck than smart." Perhaps but there's a superlative.
"It's better to be inside than anything else."
Take this guy, Roberto Hernandez. Mr. Hernandez is director at Citicorp and this is the story of his incredible luck.

Way back in 2006, Nov 9th exactly, Roberto "Lucky" Hernandez sold some stock. Some Citicorp stock. For $50.54. 14,596,100 shares for a $74m payday. Apparently our friend "Lucky" saved some of that windfall because luck was about to strike again. In 2009, March 3rd exactly in a feat of market bravery crafty Roberto scarfed up some shares. 6 million shares at $1.25. $7.5 million invested. Here's the round trip. So. How lucky? That investment is now worth $15.7m. Here's a chart covering the period:

Don't hate him because he's lucky.

Sunday, February 08, 2009

If it weren't so serious this would have devolved in farce long ago. Finally a little detail on the chickens panicking in Washington. Excerpts from the New York Times:
Wall Street helped produce the global financial and economic crisis. Now, as the Obama administration prepares to unveil a revised bailout plan for the banking system, policy makers hope Wall Street can be part of the solution.

Administration officials said the plan, to be announced Tuesday, was likely to depend in part on the willingness of private investors other than banks — like hedge funds, private equity funds and perhaps even insurance companies — to buy the contaminating assets that wiped out the capital of many banks.

OMFG moment. HEDGE FUNDS? What are they thinking? They want to introduce more leverage and debt?

The officials say they are counting on the profit motive to create a market for those assets. The government would guarantee a floor value, officials say, as a way to overcome investors’ reluctance to buy them.

Spine chills galore. "A way to overcome reluctance?" What, gold plate the turds?

Details of the new plan, which were still being worked out during the weekend, are sketchy. And they are likely to remain so even after Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner announces the plan on Tuesday.

Ahhh the announce that they will have a plan soon plan.

But the aim is to reduce the need for immediate federal financing and relieve fears that taxpayers will pay excessive prices if the government takes over risky securities. The banks created those securities when credit and home prices were booming a few years ago.

No, those securities created an environment of loose credit and house price inflation.

Besides devising a way to bring private investors into the bank bailout, the Treasury plan is expected to inject more capital into some banks and to give many homeowners relief from immediate foreclosures.

The worse keeps getting worser. Which of those are good ideas? Which in any way addresses the supposed problems?

It also is expected to increase financing for a Bush administration program intended to encourage investors to finance such things as student loans and credit card debt.

Student loans? Paid back with high paying jobs starting in the next few years?

The Treasury Department had intended to unveil the plan on Monday. But on Sunday Mr. Obama’s economic advisers said they would wait another day, to keep the focus on winning Senate approval of an economic stimulus program. Mr. Obama plans to promote the stimulus package in a televised news conference Monday night.

Let me translate. The Senate would balk if the details were known.

...After it turned out that the banks were in even worse shape than thought, the Bush administration decided it was more important to invest directly in the banks.

Well gee, shock surprise. It didn't work but this time for sure. Thus the accompanying graphic.

It was also unclear how the assets would be valued, raising political questions about whether the purchase prices would be fair both to the banks and to the taxpayers. But as those assets have remained on the banks’ balance sheets, they have continued to decline in value, producing more multibillion dollar losses.

And this stops the decline in value how? A "floor" is only risk limiting not value setting.

The securities are complex and hard to evaluate, and there is little public information about precisely which assets are owned by each bank. And some prospective purchasers say banks are not making many available for sale, or have refused to accept the prices being offered.

Another admission they are just guessing.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Shotgun Wedding


After the ceremony is she still legally your cousin? Banks are already so incestous we might as well make it legal.

Post your guesses for BFF and/or wacky marriage proposals.

What I Did On My Summer Vacation


The time stamp reads 06/23/08 04:26:06 PM

This was when I knew WaMu was doomed. I can't think of more clichés rolled into one picture.

Don't strain your eyes. Here are a few of my artsy fartsy pics from the trip:

Friday, July 11, 2008

IndyMac now IndyMac Federal

Bank Failure Friday.

http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/IndyMac.html

Next up; WaMu. You tell me why.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Last One Out Is An FDIC Creditor

Yesterday I went to IndyMac to cash out my Jumbo CD. Turns out a "30 day certificate" means 30 elapsed days so I had to go back again this morning. This is that story.

First, I didn't panic or get nervous, I was merely seeking safe returns. I had a 6mo CD as part of a ladder that expired June 2nd. I figured at the time January that 6 months was a conservative estimate of how much time they had left. At the end of those 6 months I thought they worst case had the summer to survive so I opted for the 1 month both for safety and in anticipation of better rates. Over the last week i was getting nervous. Well not nervous really as the lost interest and/or any delay would have been minimal no matter what. Ultimately it was a bit of convenience and a bit of epicaricacy along with smugness at having ridden the scariest ride in the park and escaping with a prize.

So, Tuesday morning. I got there at 8:50 and was 5th in line. Two in front were clueless, just oldsters doing some early banking. Two knew, one like me quietly or routinely repositioning and another who was making a deposit and didn't mind if there'd be a new name on the door come Monday morning. My turn came and I discovered the maturity was Wednesday not Tuesday. Filled out the paperwork and went back to work.

Wednesday morning I was the only one there at opening, cleared and closed with no problem and joked with the teller about wearing a new name badge in a few days. The teller next to here was talking on the phone about all the news article she found with a google search. Opened a money market account at my long time credit union paying more than the 9 month CD rate at IndyMac. How crazy is that? It does provide a hint for future rate seekers. Lightbulbs glow brightest just before burning out. Banks offer very high rates just before going under.

This is just the first branded bank to run afoul. The real nervous time will be after a few are shuttered and the FDIC & FSLIC run out of money to paper over the mess.