Well he's done it again. Personally I don't care. He doesn't even think of running away as running away. He thinks he's pursuing an opportunity and thinking of "relocation." Self delusion is a powerful crutch. Heck, he even thinks this isn't costing anything. S'okay he'll take care of the lawer stuff when he gets back. Entertainment value perhaps. Learn anything no. The only good thing is that when the nice men in the dark suits come to get him he won't even make bail. He's proven himself to be a flight risk. Hmmm, maybe his mommy can put up the house as collateral to make bail. Ahhh the drama never stops.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Dessert Ratz
Well he's done it again. Personally I don't care. He doesn't even think of running away as running away. He thinks he's pursuing an opportunity and thinking of "relocation." Self delusion is a powerful crutch. Heck, he even thinks this isn't costing anything. S'okay he'll take care of the lawer stuff when he gets back. Entertainment value perhaps. Learn anything no. The only good thing is that when the nice men in the dark suits come to get him he won't even make bail. He's proven himself to be a flight risk. Hmmm, maybe his mommy can put up the house as collateral to make bail. Ahhh the drama never stops.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
53 comments:
(first)
(second day running)
The fact that he's considering "relocation" seems to indicate that his relationship with G is beyond repair.
I hate to see that happen to anybody, but he has nobody to blame but himself with the way he's been jetsetting around the world to "network" (read: nap on other peoples' couches).
so total cost of australia trip:
1500 (apprx) in airfare
500(at least) for rental car
control of blog
1 marriage
hmmm hope it was worth it getting beaten up by that kangaroo.
The fact that he posted a photo to prove that he is in Phoenix tells me he's already left Phoenix. Especially since he let everyone know what hotel he was staying in.
I don't think there was any business in Phoenix, other than visiting NRU buddies. He is probably using the last of his corporate credit, plus the Paypal money from his former advertisers.
Don't Stop Runnin'
http://tinyurl.com/36g2la
I think you may have a flair for the over dramatic, he's not under any indictment that I know of. I myself suggested that he should move to another state to get a fresh start. He'll fit right in with the people in AZ, IMO. His kind of people.
Not to mention, the legal system in CA is screw hoo hooed when a jerkwad like dingleberry twist can eff people around for amusement. That $hit wouldn't fly here, I can tell you. Harassing people in the court system might just get you some street justice meted out if you tried that crap one too many times.
I don't think there was any business in Phoenix, other than visiting NRU buddies
I had the exact same thought. If there is an "opportunity", it is likely another shiny NRU object he is chasing.
Did this kid have the Pavlovian center of his brain damaged in an accident? Normally, when someone touches a hot plate, they jump back and are subsequently conditioned to not repeat the mistake. Casey on the other hand?
*burn* Ouch!
*burn* Ouch!
*burn* Ouch!
*burn* Ouch!
*burn* Ouch!
[Murse rings] Casey: Hello?
NRU Guy: Casey, it's me, NRU Guy.
Casey: "Sweeet! I knew you'd have a place for me."
NRU Guy: "Nevermind that now. We gotta talk."
Casey: "About my Vice Presidency?"
NRU Guy: "No! Shut up a minute, this is serious. People have been asking questions. We gotta get our stories straight. "
Casey: "Okay, I need to get outta here anyway. What say you fly me out and..."
Isn't RichDad PoorDad in Phoenix also?
Can someone call the phone number on the remote and confirm if C was there?
BTW it's the Scottsdale - Westin
@Mr. Dawg...
The name is worth a little, the pageranking some more and the media permanent backlinks a lot.
Are the "permanent" backlinks really that permanent? I mean if a media story about Casey was pointing to IAFF and the page was no longer about Casey, won't that link eventually get taken down? If the page changes into a SPAM or adult video site, I'm sue the media outlet won't want to be linking to it anymore.
That "opportunity" is probably an offer from a NRU shyster to buy IAFF. That site is worth a lot of money once Casey's presence is erased from it.
Any NRU scamster can put the words "IAFF, featured on the Suze Ormon show" and legally, he's correct. That kind of potential publicity and proof element is priceless to a scamster looking to fleece other "get rich quick" idiots.
Casey isn't going for a job. He'll do anything to avoid work. He's like a living Ralph Kramden, only less responsible, less loveable, and more nefarious.
From the fax number:
The Westin Kierland Villas
15620 North Clubgate Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
(480) 624-1700, (480) 624-1701, 1-800-WESTIN-1 (U.S./Canada)
That's a $200+ per night hotel. Must be nice to afford that!
no you are all wrong, he's going to go honor his commitment to the No Limits Ladies annd.....
sorry I couldn't get through that without laughing so I'm going to stop there.
It is obvious by now that Casey pretty much thumbs his nose at the law by letting them know what he is going to do next.
Casey is 100% flight risk. Normal people would not leave the state if they had the FBI on their back, just basic common sense. Casey also has a pending law suit to settle.
Casey went on to blog at one point that he may have to go under the "Radar" show the law come after him. This was after he pretty much admitted to committing multiple federal crimes.
Casey is now shoving his finger up the law's ass and wiggling it royally with his out of the state flight.
I'm still a little nervous about the fact that Casey showed up for court and his adversary didn't.
Strange days.
Has anyone actually been able to determine where Casey is staying, since he got back from Australia? Is the kid couch-surfing, or what?
If and when the FBI decides to make a move on the little waif they will have no trouble finding him. They can just loose the hounds on the scent of easy money.
Are the "permanent" backlinks really that permanent?
No, they will fade over time. And as someone else has pointed out, if Casey was "forced" to give up IAFF he could easily sabotage the pagerank.
Casey's bizarre tale is where the value lies, not the domain name. It's not even grammatically correct for search purposes. People looking for foreclosure help don't type in "iamfacingforeclosure", they would type in "i am facing foreclosure" or "i need help with foreclosure". Can Google's algorithms even pick out the word "foreclosure" from the domain name, or does it see a meaningless glot of letters?
@8:52:
Or the FBI can just send Casey a Nigerian letter telling Casey a rich uncle wants to give him money.
Casey will walk right on and up and into his cell without any other effort.
no you are all wrong, he's going to go honor his commitment to the No Limits Ladies annd.....
sorry I couldn't get through that without laughing so I'm going to stop there.
Good one, Southernbread. :-)
Maybe like every other celebrity who experienced catastrophic failure, Casey is turning to porn. They are the "no limits ladies" afterall. ;-)
*burp* Sorry. I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Lou,
Yes, Google's algorithms pick up the word foreclosure out of that domain.
IAFF's pagerank will disappear over time assuming the site is blank, and no new content is added. If someone does buy it, rest assured new content will be added often.
Casey could sabotage the site if he were forced to give it up, but if he was given a sweet price with some sweet backend income, itsallgood, as fliptard would say.
fackENers said...
--I'm still a little nervous about the fact that Casey showed up for court and his adversary didn't.
Strange days.--
More like dull days. Duane’s finished and doubt he'll be doing anymore talk cast/updates on KC or the wife.
Casey says he's got a lawyer which means Mark V. could find his own ass getting sued so we may not be hearing much from him either.
Which leaves us with just KC and I'm not sure if that's enough to keep up the intrigue. A job? Will he or won't he? Who cares? The FBI? Yeah, right.
So...unless Mark V. makes a comeback and the sparks start to fly we may be stuck with plain KC and that might not be enough to keep the fans happy anymore.
He's going to Mexico...we can hope?
He deleted a comment that mentioned that possibility.
He also deleted a comment about his family slamming the doorinhis face.
And he's touchy about his lack of a sex-life.
Casey says he's got a lawyer which means Mark V. could find his own ass getting sued so we may not be hearing much from him either.
Let's keep one thing in mind. The law and Casey means the law wins. It doesn't matter if there is anything to countersuits or that crap. The one thing Casey cannot do is appear in a court of law. That's why he pretended to settle. It was the ONLY way to stay out of court. Now he says he has a lawyer. To defend himself in court? No, to threaten countersuit on LMP. Casey cannot go before a judge or jury and he knows it. He cannot even go before an arbitrator although I don't think he knows that yet. The problem with Casey going the legal route to get what he deserves is a self answering question.
BTW;
It may just be my connection,but thecaseyserinund.com is down.
THAT was a short lifespan,huh?
Makes me wonder where Casey acquired this "lawyer". Does Nouveau Riche have a law school too?
There is some vagueness in his post as well. (Big surprise) Is this a lawyer hired specifically to deal with Mark? Or is it a defense attorney to deal with the Feds?
Rob Dawg said...
--Now he says he has a lawyer. To defend himself in court?--
Who knows? That's why he's got a lawyer.
(This assumes of course that he actually does have legal representation.)
@Sharky
It says "coming soon" when I access it. But the content is absent.
Which makes me think that Casey himself is responsible for that site. Goes with the pattern. How many times has fliptard crashed his own site due to his ineptness as a programmer?
Tom:
"Which makes me think that Casey himself is responsible for that site. Goes with the pattern. "
It WAS a WordPress site,same layout as IAFF.
And "admin" even deleted comments that pushed Fliptard's "hot buttons".
"Thanks for the money for the Westin Suite...SUCKAZ!"
You know, that brings up an interesting point and to be honest, I don't have enough knowledge in this realm.
But I am wondering: is there any law that states: if an individual begs for money for supposed reason 'A', but then in turn, uses that money for reason 'B', has he violated any law?
If Casey has pivate links and websites that plead his desperation and asks for donations for his "criminal defense fund", and then he, in turn, uses that money for "other things", has he violated any laws?
Just curious.
https://www.tdnam.com/trpItemListing.aspx?&miid=7719233
another 10% price chop, although this domain is homeless it may be considering relocating to a new webmaster domain guru hosting a rack in phoenix!
Tom:
"But I am wondering: is there any law that states: if an individual begs for money for supposed reason 'A', but then in turn, uses that money for reason 'B', has he violated any law?"
Perhaps so. Misrepresentation?
Wire fraud?
IANAL.
Yes, many of us have gotten a lot of info out of Casey indirectly by simply watching what Casey approves or not. Actually, many of my posts make it, then then magically dissapear by the next day.
So this is how we know what Casey is up to. For Casey who knows this, it's a double edge sword. He must be in hell having to decide if he should approve it or not given this dilema.
By the way, smart posts will NOT mention names as we all know that automatically get's removed.
Anyone knows if "http://caseyhaterz.com" is down?
I can't get to it from my end.
HAHA!! serinjustice got the boot. Join the club!
Me either. Looks like it's down.
Casey, I mean Edgar, how's Phoenix?
It went poof as I was sending a reply, so I suspect it's down.
Getting back to Casey, though -- he said "will be back in time to retain an attorney" which means that he has not formally hired one yet.
@Dick, Yeah, me too. I was making a supportive post about Mark when it went dead.
If it's ok with Rob, I will post it here (ps. I never use his last name, only Mark which we know who are talking about.
As for Mark, I don't know the guy, but my observation is that he is one of the few who can stop Casey legally and royally.
People here make fun that Mark is not a lawyer. In any court case, lawyers, proffesional debt collectors, etc, each specializes in one particular area.
I personally would take the biggest laywer idiot there is who specializes in a given area of the law, than the best well known and respected lawyer in town who only has general knowledge of the law for which I am seeking representation.
Even the most powerful and knowledable lawyers hire other lawyers who especialize in the area they need representaion. For example, a criminal lawyer will hire a divorce lawyer because the criminal lawyer is out of waters when it comes to divorce legalese.
What makes Mark a powerful individual, is his multiple years of doing collections - he knows all of the tricks, avenues, time frames, wording, tactics and legal manuvering available. With that many years under his belt, he knows what works and what does not even if it looks like a "dumb" legal action. The end result is that he wins.
I would even say that if Mark had a law degree, that would set him back as by not having one, he can approach the Courts much easier as an individual. The courts wont see this as Goliath vs David (Lawer vs Casey) type of case, but more as a citizen complaint against another citizen.
The fact that Mark got his case to be heard so fast, proves that the guy knows what he is doing.
Oh and by the way, I am not a "supporter" of Mark. I just like the fact that he had the balls to stand up to Casey and Marty. Not by cheap talk, but by actions!
Kudos to you Mark.
he said "will be back in time to retain an attorney" which means that he has not formally hired one yet.
He'll look into it.
I said this on CH.C: I'll believe it when I see it. "Attorney tomorrow" has too much of a "good things are coming" whiff.
Good for him if he actually does follow through, though.
@Tom:
"But I am wondering: is there any law that states: if an individual begs for money for supposed reason 'A', but then in turn, uses that money for reason 'B', has he violated any law?"
As you can imagine, it depends. Universities, hospitals, and other non-profits have to change giving structures all the time, for good and bad reasons. An example of a good reason: a donor endows a laboratory room in a science building. Twenty years later, the laboratory is outmoded, and the university would like to direct the endowment to a computer lab instead. Usually, this goes ahead after talking to the original donor, but sometimes they can't (say if the donor died), and sometimes they don't (if they can't find the donor, or don't bother).
Now sometimes universities or hospitals direct the money away from the donor's stated project for "bad" reasons--say, the project doesn't meet with a new director's plans, or the institution just wants funding for something else. I know a number of situations where that's happened, but I've never heard of any criminal prosecutions for it. The IRS doesn't really care: all they want to know is whether Person X gave Institution Y money.
Civil claims, though, are another matter. In a nutshell, if Donor X and Institution Y signed a contract that Donor X's money was to go to a science building, Donor X could claim breach of contract if Institution Y funded the basketball team with the cash instead. The tricky part is that non-profit institutions' budget are to some extent amorphous: all revenue goes to the same pot, then the institution pays all of expenses out of the pot. If someone gives a million dollars to the science building, there's nothing stopping the university from budgeting a million dollars less to the science building, appropriating the donation to the building, then throwing an extra million dollars to the basketball team.
So the short answer is: I dunno. The way I see it, if someone gave enough money to Casey to be worth trying to get it back, they were a dumbass for doing it in the first place. Call it a "dumbass tax" and let the big players (mortgage companies, Fibbies) gnaw on his corpse instead.
Oh and by the way, I am not a "supporter" of Mark. I just like the fact that he had the balls to stand up to Casey and Marty. Not by cheap talk, but by actions!
Barf! Ralph! Dude, why don't go have sex with him already?
Dude, why don't go have sex with him already?
Grow up, Edgar. "You must be gay for him then!" is cheap and juvenile.
Meh... this whole thing his getting annoying. Getting bored with the whole Casey, Galina, Duane, Mark saga. And CaseyHaterz.com has jumped the shark for me too.
I miss FC.
@Researcher/@Sharky,
Thanks for the feedback.
Wire fraud might be a good possibility. I can't be certain.
My memory is hazy, but I seem to recall some individual a few years back begging for funds for a supposed 'cancer-related' illness. Which turned out to be false. I think he did actually face legal ramifications. Misrepresentation perhaps?
I dunno either. Might explain why Duane mentioned that other "three letter agencies" of the government are looking into him. I think that falls under the realm of the FTC.
My memory is hazy, but I seem to recall some individual a few years back begging for funds for a supposed 'cancer-related' illness. Which turned out to be false. I think he did actually face legal ramifications. Misrepresentation perhaps?
Something similar happened in Britain only last week - she claimed to be collecting contributions for a charitable cause, but was actually funding her drug habit.
The charge, unsurprisingly, was theft.
@Tom:
Here's an example of "cancer fraud" (http://www.journaltimes.com/articles/2005/01/26/local/iq_3344500.txt). This case was from Wisconsin; I don't know what the laws are elsewhere.
"Intent to decieve" is the specific point which much be proven in a case like this. In the Wisconsin case it's easy: woman says she's taking money for cancer treatments, but she doesn't have cancer. Casey's deceit would be a little harder to prove. "Help me pay my criminal defense fund" is vague. "Pay for my (real) lawyer" is more specific.
MA has brought criminal cheages against 'cancer fraudsters' also.
This cancer scam seems to be pretty popular. Several years ago here was also a notorious woman in this area who scammed her coworkers out of their money for "brain cancer treatment". She just had to shave her head and act sick. She also got weeks of sick leave for free.
Her scamming ways were exposed when she became the alleged victim of a series of hate crimes. She went to the media claiming the police weren't doing anything to protect her. The police had actually been busy. They had video taped her spray-painting "KKK" and the N-word on her house and setting her porch on fire just before she called to report another "hate crime".
I don't know if she was prosecuted for the cancer scam. She reminds me of Casey: doesn't want to work, will gladly take any money that comes their way, and is destructively desperate for any kind of media attention.
@Scott,
That wasn't Mocha, was it?
:-)
Post a Comment