Housing Bubble, credit bubble, public planning, land use, zoning and transportation in the exurban environment. Specific criticism of smart growth, neotradtional, forms based, new urbanism and other top down planner schemes to increase urban extent and density. Ventura County, California specific examples.
I'm telling ya, the obvious PhotoShop™ follow-up is to show a group of U.S. soldiers or FBI Agents dragging Casey Serin out of his "spider hole" a la Saddam Hussein. Put a huge gray and black beard on Casey as well... heh
Remember what Saddam said (in English, no less!) when he was pulled out? Here's Casey's soundbite:
"I am Casey Serin, the acting president of Finch Properties and Hammar Investments. Don't shoot. I want to negotiate!"
Case Number: 04SC01797 Filing Date: 03/04/2004 Case Type: P.I. / P.D. - Auto Case Title: SERIN, MARGARITA VICTORIA VS. DELEON, LUISA Select Name Party Type DELEON, LUISA Defendant SERIN, MARGARITA VICTORIA Plaintiff
Calm down r-boy. Itsallgood. The traffic accident would be one or even two but the breach of contract. There's one worth asking about. To go to court and against a 21 year old. That's interesting.
If you want to find the Serin v Lomax suit, search for "small claims", not "civil".
I don't think the auto accident case is our murse-muppet - there's no way he was a minor in 2006, and they wouldn't have appointed a guardian ad litem for a 20-something.
Was Snowflake doing his web design biz in 2003? If so, he might have taken money from a client, then gone into 'client ignore mode' and neglected to actually do the guy's website.
Aaron Lomax was a deadbeat tenant whom I started to sue for not paying me rent. This was my first property, a condo in Sacramento that I bought when I was 19. I sold it a year later because the market was hot and I stopped getting rent. It was my mistake for letting him in there. He came straight from an eviction and I didn’t even check his background. So I did the cash-for-keys program instead of trying to evict. However the money I gave him to move out was a loan. Plus he owed me for a month or two rent I think. All together it was about $2400 I think. He signed a promissory note to pay it back within a certain amount of time. He never did. So I started to sue him but then decided to not bother. The $35K I made on the sale of the property covered my loss and I just forgave him and moved on.
Also, if you are asking yourself, "Does CashCall really sue debtors to collect?", then put "CashCall" into the party name and search for civil cases .. and, yep, there are a bunch of them in Sacramento County, seems like they like to use an attorney named Daniel H. Baren.
Crap that Lomax story is pathetic and depressing. I've been burned by tenants but never quite that burned. Cash for keys? Fuck that. I give beatings UNTIL keys. But deadbeats can be slippery. Ha ha I said deadbeats.
So that $35K (or $30K which was the number Casey used to throw around, whatever, it's all good!) profit on Casey's condo isn't actually $35K (or $30K) when you deduct out the fact that he was renting it out to a deadbeat tennant and then took the nonpayer to court and paid filing fees and then ditched the suit PLUS loaned the guy money to get out.
LOL! Sweetness!
No wonder Snowflake didn't try to rent out his 8 properties...he even fails at slumlordship.
But hey he's 'failing forward' with other people's money. Whee!
TVRYB, Worse than that. When he "sold" the condo for $30,000 he didn't really get $30,00 since part of the deal was that he was required to buy that first house (Muncy?) at an inflated price.
If snowflake had sat on that condo with a reliable tennant all this time he'd be up $100,000 instead of down $550,000 and counting.
Rob, The condo was a separate sweet deal. It was Calla Way that was linked to Burdett. He sold the condo in 2003 and bought Calla in 2005.
I love the way all of his sweet deals are never quite so sweet upon closer inspection.
"I made $30k on my first flip!" "... except for the fact that I had to pay for court costs, several months of missed rent, and give the guy $3k to go away."
"I successfully flipped my second house for a profit!" ".....except that I had to buy the buyer's old shitty house as part of the sweet deal, was never able to sell that one, got foreclosed on, and ate an enormous loss."
Geez keeping the properties and numbers straight makes my head hurt. And it's not that big a deal to me because hey I'm just here for the amusement value. I can't imagine what kind of headaches it gives Galina the 'bookkeeper' and Snowflake (whose latest comment is all about his 'sweet' spike in blog traffic after Nightline).
The only math that matters to the celebutard wannabe is the number of people paying attention to him (reminds me of my neighbors kids, aged 6 and 3).
I wonder just how much TV they have to watch to escape the headache their budgetary numbers must give them?
Oh look. A lesson on the judicial system from Nigel. Because, you know, he's qualified to give legal advice too because of his stupendous ability to use Wikipedia.
Which, as we know, is read on the internet, so it must be right.
Schnapps, Shhhhh. My comment has been up there for nearly a day and he hasn't noticed that it says flat out he is comitting a crime. Now that you've made the observation expect him to try to change history yet again. Oh, and his latest screed? He is a truly troubled person.
Does it bother anyone else that Nigel links even the simplest remark to a reference page? This is just a pet peeve of mine I suppose. Does anyone really need an explanation of what the "big cheese" is? Who doesn't know what a plea bargin is?
Yet another way Mr. Swaby bugs the hell out of me.
I think Nigel ought to familiarize himself with this before he offers any more of his 'legal opinions'
Rule 14-111. Practicing without a license prohibited.
(a) Action or proceedings to enforce. Exception. Pursuant to Rule 14-506(a), no person who is not duly admitted and licensed to practice law in Utah as an attorney at law or as a foreign legal consultant nor any person whose right or license to so practice has terminated either by disbarment, suspension, failure to pay his or her license and other fees or otherwise, shall practice or assume to act or hold himself or herself out to the public as a person qualified to practice law or to carry on the calling of an attorney at law in Utah. Such practice, or assumption to act or holding out, by any such unlicensed or disbarred or suspended person shall not constitute a crime, but this prohibition against the practice of law by any such person shall be enforced by such civil action or proceedings, including writ, contempt or injunctive proceedings, as may be necessary and appropriate, which action or which proceedings shall be instituted by the Bar after approval by the Board.
(b) Nothing in this article shall prohibit a person who is unlicensed as an attorney at law or a foreign legal consultant from personally representing that person's own interests in a cause to which the person is a party in his or her own right and not as assignee.
More generally he should also take a look at this http://www.utcourts.gov/resources/rules/ucja/index.htm#Chapter 13
In other words Nigel, those of you who think you are qualified to offer legal opinions can easily be spanked by those of us who actually *are*.
Also has it occured to Nigel that there are multiple jurisdictions with multiple bar associations and licensing boards to which he could be responsible if he goes further in trying to advise people of 'the law' of their jurisdiction? In Snowflake's case UT, NM, TX and CA laws will apply not to mention some federal law issues.
The condo sale in 2003 - did Casey pay capital gains tax on his $30,000 profit? (Or whatever amount his profit may have been?)
He lived in the place for about a year until he started renting it out. My guess, even with the "remodel" he and his dad did, along with the "cash for keys" transaction, he made some profit. According to Casey's own story, he walked away with $30,000 - which is what he was making as a "programmer."
Oh Rob - you forgot to dimension the width of the hole - is it 5' 2" or something like that? Just about 2" more than Snowflakes height according to the ticket?
Thanks to Vague Guru with a few mods of my own.
32 comments:
FIRST
Read it and weep....you loosers!
Murse!
KC's bunker needs to be deeper than 6 feet. At 6 feet, he's about as far down as Yulia's first floor/garage.
The bunker looks like a cross between a grave and a toilet......
That blue ball controls the flush and the question is whether there's enough karma to move the turd down the sewer.
I'm telling ya, the obvious PhotoShop™ follow-up is to show a group of U.S. soldiers or FBI Agents dragging Casey Serin out of his "spider hole" a la Saddam Hussein. Put a huge gray and black beard on Casey as well... heh
Remember what Saddam said (in English, no less!) when he was pulled out? Here's Casey's soundbite:
"I am Casey Serin, the acting president of Finch Properties and Hammar Investments. Don't shoot. I want to negotiate!"
:-)
06AS05460
Konstanin Serin involved in a court case in Nov 206. (a minor?)
:02AS01233
Lyidia Serin, court case, traffic
from sac superior court
GOLD MINE~!
GOLD MINE~!
CASEY SERIN, BREACH OF CONTRACT
Case Number: 03SC07071
Filing Date: 08/07/2003
Case Type: Breach of Contract
Case Title: SERIN, CASEY K VS. LOMAX, AARON
Case Number: 04SC01797
Filing Date: 03/04/2004
Case Type: P.I. / P.D. - Auto
Case Title: SERIN, MARGARITA VICTORIA VS. DELEON, LUISA
Select Name Party Type
DELEON, LUISA Defendant
SERIN, MARGARITA VICTORIA Plaintiff
Casey was the plaintiff in a breach suit?!?
Calm down r-boy. Itsallgood. The traffic accident would be one or even two but the breach of contract. There's one worth asking about. To go to court and against a 21 year old. That's interesting.
Oh, and to think Rob Dawg, these are things I can talk about.
If you want to find the Serin v Lomax suit, search for "small claims", not "civil".
I don't think the auto accident case is our murse-muppet - there's no way he was a minor in 2006, and they wouldn't have appointed a guardian ad litem for a 20-something.
Was Snowflake doing his web design biz in 2003? If so, he might have taken money from a client, then gone into 'client ignore mode' and neglected to actually do the guy's website.
Casey Serin said...
Aaron Lomax was a deadbeat tenant whom I started to sue for not paying me rent. This was my first property, a condo in Sacramento that I bought when I was 19. I sold it a year later because the market was hot and I stopped getting rent. It was my mistake for letting him in there. He came straight from an eviction and I didn’t even check his background. So I did the cash-for-keys program instead of trying to evict. However the money I gave him to move out was a loan. Plus he owed me for a month or two rent I think. All together it was about $2400 I think. He signed a promissory note to pay it back within a certain amount of time. He never did. So I started to sue him but then decided to not bother. The $35K I made on the sale of the property covered my loss and I just forgave him and moved on.
wow, he answered that one fast.
Ive got better ones.
=)
He needs to wake up and realize that I'm digging around worse than Homey.
Also, if you are asking yourself, "Does CashCall really sue debtors to collect?", then put "CashCall" into the party name and search for civil cases .. and, yep, there are a bunch of them in Sacramento County, seems like they like to use an attorney named Daniel H. Baren.
the blue ball got the laugh. like it corks him in there.
Crap that Lomax story is pathetic and depressing. I've been burned by tenants but never quite that burned. Cash for keys? Fuck that. I give beatings UNTIL keys. But deadbeats can be slippery. Ha ha I said deadbeats.
ROFL!
Oh, shit! The more I look at this picture the harder I laugh!
Almost perfect, needs a jar of "organic hair wax".
@R-Boy
So that $35K (or $30K which was the number Casey used to throw around, whatever, it's all good!) profit on Casey's condo isn't actually $35K (or $30K) when you deduct out the fact that he was renting it out to a deadbeat tennant and then took the nonpayer to court and paid filing fees and then ditched the suit PLUS loaned the guy money to get out.
LOL! Sweetness!
No wonder Snowflake didn't try to rent out his 8 properties...he even fails at slumlordship.
But hey he's 'failing forward' with other people's money. Whee!
TVRYB,
Worse than that. When he "sold" the condo for $30,000 he didn't really get $30,00 since part of the deal was that he was required to buy that first house (Muncy?) at an inflated price.
If snowflake had sat on that condo with a reliable tennant all this time he'd be up $100,000 instead of down $550,000 and counting.
Rob,
The condo was a separate sweet deal. It was Calla Way that was linked to Burdett. He sold the condo in 2003 and bought Calla in 2005.
I love the way all of his sweet deals are never quite so sweet upon closer inspection.
"I made $30k on my first flip!"
"... except for the fact that I had to pay for court costs, several months of missed rent, and give the guy $3k to go away."
"I successfully flipped my second house for a profit!"
".....except that I had to buy the buyer's old shitty house as part of the sweet deal, was never able to sell that one, got foreclosed on, and ate an enormous loss."
"Who wants to partner with me?"
@ming & robdawg
Geez keeping the properties and numbers straight makes my head hurt. And it's not that big a deal to me because hey I'm just here for the amusement value. I can't imagine what kind of headaches it gives Galina the 'bookkeeper' and Snowflake (whose latest comment is all about his 'sweet' spike in blog traffic after Nightline).
The only math that matters to the celebutard wannabe is the number of people paying attention to him (reminds me of my neighbors kids, aged 6 and 3).
I wonder just how much TV they have to watch to escape the headache their budgetary numbers must give them?
Oh look. A lesson on the judicial system from Nigel. Because, you know, he's qualified to give legal advice too because of his stupendous ability to use Wikipedia.
Which, as we know, is read on the internet, so it must be right.
Gah.
Schnapps,
Shhhhh. My comment has been up there for nearly a day and he hasn't noticed that it says flat out he is comitting a crime. Now that you've made the observation expect him to try to change history yet again. Oh, and his latest screed? He is a truly troubled person.
Does it bother anyone else that Nigel links even the simplest remark to a reference page? This is just a pet peeve of mine I suppose. Does anyone really need an explanation of what the "big cheese" is? Who doesn't know what a plea bargin is?
Yet another way Mr. Swaby bugs the hell out of me.
I think Nigel ought to familiarize himself with this before he offers any more of his 'legal opinions'
Rule 14-111. Practicing without a license prohibited.
(a) Action or proceedings to enforce. Exception. Pursuant to Rule 14-506(a), no person who is not duly admitted and licensed to practice law in Utah as an attorney at law or as a foreign legal consultant nor any person whose right or license to so practice has terminated either by disbarment, suspension, failure to pay his or her license and other fees or otherwise, shall practice or assume to act or hold himself or herself out to the public as a person qualified to practice law or to carry on the calling of an attorney at law in Utah. Such practice, or assumption to act or holding out, by any such unlicensed or disbarred or suspended person shall not constitute a crime, but this prohibition against the practice of law by any such person shall be enforced by such civil action or proceedings, including writ, contempt or injunctive proceedings, as may be necessary and appropriate, which action or which proceedings shall be instituted by the Bar after approval by the Board.
(b) Nothing in this article shall prohibit a person who is unlicensed as an attorney at law or a foreign legal consultant from personally representing that person's own interests in a cause to which the person is a party in his or her own right and not as assignee.
More generally he should also take a look at this
http://www.utcourts.gov/resources/rules/ucja/index.htm#Chapter 13
In other words Nigel, those of you who think you are qualified to offer legal opinions can easily be spanked by those of us who actually *are*.
Amen to anon @10:40 am
Also has it occured to Nigel that there are multiple jurisdictions with multiple bar associations and licensing boards to which he could be responsible if he goes further in trying to advise people of 'the law' of their jurisdiction? In Snowflake's case UT, NM, TX and CA laws will apply not to mention some federal law issues.
I have asked many times....
The condo sale in 2003 - did Casey pay capital gains tax on his $30,000 profit? (Or whatever amount his profit may have been?)
He lived in the place for about a year until he started renting it out. My guess, even with the "remodel" he and his dad did, along with the "cash for keys" transaction, he made some profit. According to Casey's own story, he walked away with $30,000 - which is what he was making as a "programmer."
So, did he pay capital gains?
The IRS wants to know.
Oh Rob - you forgot to dimension the width of the hole - is it 5' 2" or something like that? Just about 2" more than Snowflakes height according to the ticket?
Post a Comment