Relentless observes: ”court tommorrow right? you [LossMitPro] expect a TRO or just a schedule for the next hearing?”
LossMitPro replies: No TRO, I’m asking for an order shortening time that’s all. Cuts the 664 motion time from about 20 days to around 10 (or less), and is just an in-Chamber meeting. Not a real critical step in the judge’s decision process, but helps to cut time from Casey selling IAFF and jammin outta here with the money.
----
69 comments:
mark why dont you just walk away from your failed partnership (or whatever) with casey ?
Let's see. An anon poster thinks LossMiPro is a jerk at least and most likely far far worse and that same anon poster has to ask? Get a clue. I'm pretty sure if people weren't unjustly going after the victims in this mess those victims would all pretty much be happy to walk away.
Let's get real here. Does anyone actually believe Casey is a flight risk? Come on. In fact this whole business is ridiculous. Either LMP wins his case or he doesn't. And for someone supposedly upset about having their identity splashed across the internet, LMP certainly seemed to be enjoying the on-going drama.
At 9:57 PM, fackENers said...
mark why dont you just walk away from your failed partnership (or whatever) with casey ?
LMP can't leave; he's in love with Casey!
lmp got to do his business in public for once, "ripping throats out" in front of a live internet audience. why would casey not be a flight risk? can you see him at the airport with twenty thousand dollars in his hand, buying a ticket to New Zealand? come on, that's terribly easy to visualize. he made it so.
John:
"Does anyone actually believe Casey is a flight risk?"
Hmm, let me think...I seem to recall that Casey flew/fled to the other side of the planet not so long ago, so unless someone has confiscated his passport, I'll admit to thinking it's a very real possibility. What makes you so sure he wouldn't be a flight risk? It's not as if he has much of a life here any more.
I'm kind of surprised there hasn't been any separation/divorce paperwork filed on the Sac Court website..
I dunno why Casey doesn't fold up and leave the country.. Uzbekistan may be nicer than SacTown this time of year..
Oh, and antipodean MURSTsupial!
Relax dog. The reason I ask is b/c I read that Marty is willing to walk away, of course, after being reimbursed for his expenses. Seems Mark doesn't like all the negative publicity. Seems like a valid question to ask. Marty is in it to make money. Mark says he is/was in it partially for altruistic reasons. Seems he is getting burned why not just walk away?Sorry for offending you Rob with my question for Mark.
"Does anyone actually believe Casey is a flight risk?"
Yeah the idea of Casey leaving seems over the top. Casey went to Australia to advertise his blog and maybe make some deals. Why would he come back? He heard about the lawsuit while he was there. If he was fleeing the US a lawsuit would just be another reason to not come back. I think the fact that he did come back is fodder for thinking he is not a flight risk.
Doug: Jeez, not THAT again! How original.
i wonder why she doesn't post here much. gosh, i wonder
John Hoarty is on the march, calls Serin articulate, says he fudged one-two loan applications. Ok, old article. But now John's taking a 15% commission on funds for Casey's "legal defense". Even if we want to help John Hoarty and Serin's legal position out, how do we know about the other 85%? But nobody is willing to take this fairly easy job at 0%, with transparency. Which is a little unfortunate. So an opportunistic Russian steps in for a fee.
"Legal Defense Fund" = one-way ticket to Moscow.
"Mission accomplished!"
@11:26 PM, star
I bet you posted almost exactly the same thing that I did, then realized that it'd be funnier if you said nothing.
*wink*
john @ 10:19 PM:
”Either LMP wins his case or he doesn't. And for someone supposedly upset about having their identity splashed across the internet, LMP certainly seemed to be enjoying the on-going drama.”
Actually, John, there is no “case” to win or lose. The matter was settled by written agreement, plain and simple, no ifs ands or buts about it. But that’s for a judge to finally decide now; my opinion doesn’t matter much in that regard, only the court’s.
And I’m not enjoying the “drama” just the mentality that WANTS me to discuss details then takes pot shots when I do. It’s pretty funny from where I stand. First I’m a good guy, then I’m questionable, and then I’m picking on poor Snowflake, or I’m a “bully,” but wait... I’m a wanna-be lawyer who doesn’t know crap from crayons! Yeeeeah, that’s the ticket!
Do you see my point? Some folks are never satisfied with the truth, so they conjure things to replace the truth. They research my background, extrapolate bits and pieces, and think that’s the whole picture; leaping to outlandish conclusions. Sooooo, who is enjoying the “drama” again??
As for my identity? As I’ve said repeatedly, folks can justify actions to their heart’s content. But they cannot diminish the truth that I (me, Mark) have never exposed my full real identity, irrespective my involvement in a public debate. “Outting” a private person whose identity was not voluntarily rendered, regardless of their involvement in the public eye, is an invasion of privacy! This is why the REAL News media often obtain releases from man-on-the-street interviews, concerning matters of public controversy.
...HELLLOOOOO, knock on computer screen??? ;)
~Mark
you musta signed those court papers with X's and a smiley face. That way you stay private!
Mark,
I've got a quick question for you, if you don't mind. After your legal issue with Casey gets resolved, will you still contribute to EN and other haterz sites? Or are you of the mindset of just wanting to put this whole thing behind you as soon as you receive your compensation?
The matter was settled by written agreement, plain and simple, no ifs ands or buts about it. But that’s for a judge to finally decide now;
You just contradicted yourself in two sentences. I hope you don't do that in front of the judge.
What is Rabies?
Rabies is an ancient disease. It is well described in writings by Egyptians dating back to 2300 B.C. Rabies disease is caused by a virus that is present predominately in the saliva of rabid animals. The virus is transmitted by the bite of an infected animal. Rabies virus causes an inflammation of the brain, and is almost always fatal once symptoms develop. In wild and domestic animals, rabies virus may affect the part of the brain which regulates aggression, causing the animal to attack without fear or provocation. The rabies virus may also cause other changes in animal behavior. Wild animals that are normally out only at night may be seen during the day, approaching humans and domestic pets that they ordinarily would avoid.
@11:38 PM, LossMitPro
Never mind. The wonderful people at caseyhaterz.com interrupted their imminent implosion for a few minutes and confirmed that was not the real Galina.
Your services will not be needed. I guess you get that a lot.
whatthefuckever, don't be so hard on LiMP dick he is probably LiMPotent. Bwahaha!!
[link]
New post over at IAFF. Casey says that the ex part thing "is getting old."
I am willing to pay $100 for a picture of Mark Villasenor to any Sacramento locals who can make it to the courthouse and snap one.
Make it $500 and I'll consider it. Cell phone camera acceptable?
LMP said:
---Do you see my point? Some folks are never satisfied with the truth, so they conjure things to replace the truth. They research my background, extrapolate bits and pieces, and think that’s the whole picture; leaping to outlandish conclusions. Sooooo, who is enjoying the “drama” again??--
You and everyone else (myself included) who contributes on this and on other Casey-related boards. Again if you were concerned with keeping this mess out of the public eye you wouldn't be blabbing on talk cast or the internet. You'd simply take care of the matter in court privately but hey, where's the fun is that?
Unfortunately you’ve gotten stuck with our tar baby Casey and I can’t see anyone eager to do business with you after listening to your outburst (talk cast) or reading many of the comments. In fact you (and Duane) have actually accomplished the impossible: Which is turning Casey into a somewhat sympathetic character.
Cell phone camera acceptable?
Go walt, go!
@LMP 11:38p
“Outting” [sic] a private person whose identity was not voluntarily rendered, regardless of their [sic] involvement in the public eye, is an invasion of privacy!
Tough.
Just as well. I'd rather not have Mark rip my throat out. :)
Here's an option for the Flipster.
Whatever your origins, nationality or religion might be, whatever qualifications you may or may not have, whatever your social or professional status might be, whether you are married or single, the French Foreign Legion offers you a chance to start a new life...
By joining the French Foreign Legion, you are sure to be a part of the news that makes the headlines either in France on manoeuvres, or on external operations in Frances territories abroad... (French Guyana, New Caledonia, Mayotte, la Reunion, the French West Indies...)
Join the 7655 legionnaires and non-commissioned officers hailing from 136 different countries, including France. Build yourself an exceptional future in which "honour" and "fidelity" are fundamental values. [Oops, never mind.]
http://www.legion-recrute.com/en/
@Edgar
Guess you'll just have to wait ;-)
Instead of suing everyone who says "Villasenor," wouldn't it be easier to just change your name to "Jones"?
https://www.tdnam.com/trpItemListing.aspx?&miid=7719233
price chopped another 10%
price will be chopped 10% daily
10% for fishy treats
10% for galina's dicorce fund
i resperve the right to sue,slander,liable & change my mind
by posting GO DADDY, NO DEAL three times in a row
I'm still confused.
When did he LMP start using his first name (Mark) over his middle name (Anthony) or is this part of the subtefuge?
SPUTNIK?
thats a very gross racist statement attacking mexicans.
im sure small claims court is filled with anglos, wasps, & jews.
but hey thats alot of money for a cracker!
making an argument that call INS (its ICE now) someone might be undocumented, is another scandalous statement, a classic ploy people use to take advantage of immigrants by playing on their fear of deportation.
if you convert that to pesos, 1 US dollar is 10.79 pesos, so thats alot of burritos!
Important point in general: the players in the game chose to become involved. They chose to continue to be involved. And they choose their level of involvement in the community. They are all getting something out of it -- if they weren't, they would take Nigel's approach and disengage.
Mark's involvement plays to his sense of self-importance.
Duane is emotionally involved -- no prurient slurs intended, but he clearly sees Galina as the victim and feels a duty to rescue her from Casey's damage. I don't think he will be able to walk away. And besides that, he clearly enjoys the community.
aaaaack!!
Oh, I was just kiddin' around!
I removed the post so's I don't hurt anyone's feelings...
S_t_C
OH, and by the way, I think illegal immigrants SHOULD live in fear of deportation. Just like Casey should live in fear of going to jail for mortgage fraud...
Let's not be hypocrites and give one class of lawbreakers a free pass...
thppttt!!
S_t_C
Slait? Good post and very true. I'm not sure anyone had stated that yet.
WHat each player may be 'getting out of it' s subject to debate but they must be getting something or they would walk away.
Jesus walt526, don't be fucking greedy. And for $500, the very least you can fucking do is use a REAL camera, perhaps with a telephoto lens so you can get the horns on LMP's head.
BTW, I don't know if I would trust an ascii troll for payment.
I think Casey and Marty may have kissed and made up. Casey said his other business was going well and Marty has not posted any updates on Foreclosurecode.com since sunday.
LossMitPro@11:38 stated
"Do you see my point? Some folks are never satisfied with the truth, so they conjure things to replace the truth. They research my background, extrapolate bits and pieces, and think that’s the whole picture; leaping to outlandish conclusions."
Rosebud was his sled.
NR
Marty, besides pursuing the enforcement of his settlement agreement with Casey, has expressly stated his desire and intention to pursue Hammar Investments. However, he will not include Momma Babushka in any suit.
@dick
Mark has the settlement agreement, not Marty.
Marty, besides pursuing the enforcement of his settlement agreement with Casey, has expressly stated his desire and intention to pursue Hammar Investments.
Mark, surely?
@LMP
You mind commenting on this post you made a while ago and how this is different from the current situation that yourself are in and that you are ready to fight in the courts? Are there different levels of public information?
I would also like to know if at this point you still believe that you are not a public figure in this story.
You seem to have a very set mind about this issue and I am trying to understand what your arguments are.
@ GeorgiaGirl89 & Miguel,
Yes, of course. Thank you for catching my error and correcting it.
Must have been fantasizing about Marty whilst typing that post.
@LossMitPro:
But they cannot diminish the truth that I (me, Mark) have never exposed my full real identity, irrespective my involvement in a public debate.
Mark, I keep raising this and you keep not addressing it. YOU HAVE exposed your full real identity, into official public record, by filing a complaint against Casey.
Grownup businessman vs. Grownup fake lawyer
LMP is starting to display Casey-esque cognitive dissonance. And even Rob, in his shameless defense of him.
"All of these people who hate me now must be wrong! I'm not on trial here! It's him! Hiiiiiim!"
LMP, your original case against him was questionable, but here's where you succeeded: You tricked a simpleton into signing a settlement that he basically gets no benefit from. Which is sort of impressive, in a sleazy kind of way. But you're losing your dignity.
Congrats, Captain Ahab.
/slowclap
LMM,
The answer to your question is simple enough, after the fact. Way after the fact.
The FACT is that Mark posted his real identity way back in about 2000 or even further when he ran a site called CreditDefenses.com with his full name disclosed in the FAQ and postings on the creditnet.com forums signing off every post with:
Keep the faith
Anthony Villaseñor
Although, one could obviously distinguish that that was a long time ago and on a different board and the question of legality here is tied to the current "outing" of the real personal life information of the person known as LossMitPro. But we have already establish WHO it was that outed LMP.
The question I have to ask, is what, if any rights a person really has as far has personal privacy if they willfully choose to:
1) post on the internet (EN does not have a privacy statement - neither does Casey/IAFF for that matter))
2) deal with an individual who is in the public eye (to my knowledge, Casey and Mark have NEVER signed a confidentially agreement)
3) enforce privacy concerns after a considerable about of time in which your information has been "outed" and displayed on the internet with your knowledge without protest/action on your part
Mark, please feel free to explain your rights, without dropping a ton of California Code Sections and actual court cases. It's not like anyone is going to actually review them.
@sweet_cashback
great example dude!
also this from CH.C
http://consumers.creditnet.com/Discussions/credit-talk/t-open-letter-re-bauer-issues-10251.html
@lawnmower_man
agreed.
@LMP
What's with all the talkcast appearances? I can't imagine anyone who wanted to shun publicity would be actively involved in so visible an activity.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not begrudging you a good time (you clearly enjoy yourself in a serious-minded kinda way) but how does this tie in with your request for privacy.
That's the bit that just doesnt add up for me. You seemingly collect your 15 minutes of fame with relish but begrudge the public profile. I didnt think you could have one without the other so I'm interested in your view on this.
Dick Said:
> Mark, please feel free to explain your
> rights, without dropping a ton of California
> Code Sections and actual court cases. It's
> not like anyone is going to actually review
> them.
But it's fun to check his cites - they are wildly off and show why a real lawyer does not use Google to find case law.
His statements of law are even more fun - "Fair Use" requires permission from the author, my "REAL NAME" is mine so you can't use it... The list goes on.
Let him rant. The more he writes, the less credibility he has. Tryign to salvage his rep by putting MORE silly statements on the web is a great move (try Googling his name and see what you get - nice rep).
Now try Googling his company - I'm sure his boss must be REALLY pleased with what comes up. I know if I was looing at their company and saw that, I certainly would not want to do business with them.
@ dick
Jesus walt526, don't be fucking greedy. And for $500, the very least you can fucking do is use a REAL camera, perhaps with a telephoto lens so you can get the horns on LMP's head.
He made an offer, I made a counteroffer. Things didn't work out. Sometimes the best deal is the one you never make. It's all good. [/guruspeak]
Seriously, I was just having some fun with him. Although for $500, it's certainly something that I would consider. My office is 5 minutes from the Sacramento courthouse.
@ Property Flopper
Oh I have... I have been Googling. :)
@ walt,
Just busting your balls. Wasn't it you who asked if Mark if he'd mind you stopping by the court as an observer? I noticed he hesitated for a moment, then basically said you'd be wasting your time because alls he was going to do was be in chambers.
Was O.J. Simpson a flight risk?
Guys - We're talking about $20k. How far can he run on that kind of money?
He'd piss through that in about three months and he'd be stuck. It is VERY unlikely that he'd be comfortable (or even welcome) in a country with no extradition treaty (there are only a few)...
CS could TRY to run, but he'd fail at that too. Personally, I don't think he has it in him to even try.
He won't pay debts with the money (he'll blow it on something shiney), but he won't run.
Just busting your balls. Wasn't it you who asked if Mark if he'd mind you stopping by the court as an observer? I noticed he hesitated for a moment, then basically said you'd be wasting your time because alls he was going to do was be in chambers.
Yeah, that was me. I didn't have really anything to ask Mark (I wanted to talk about the problems over on CHC), so that was the only thing that popped into my head to ask. It probably sounded pretty silly.
I wouldn't take time off from work to go to any of Mark's hearings, I don't think. I might be tempted to attend some of his criminal trial proceedings if it wasn't too inconvenient. It really depends on how busy I am at work.
The past few weeks have been really slow, so I could conceivably slip away for a few hours and run down to the courthouse without missing anything all that import here.
But for $500, I'd consider make a special trip to take his pictures. But $100 is just not enough an incentive. :)
Mark Anthony? Isn't he the guy that ran off with some queen after stabbing a guy in the back?
Post a Comment