Housing Bubble, credit bubble, public planning, land use, zoning and transportation in the exurban environment. Specific criticism of smart growth, neotradtional, forms based, new urbanism and other top down planner schemes to increase urban extent and density. Ventura County, California specific examples.
Sunday, July 22, 2007
Play the Victim
Serial Mortgage Fraud Boi on IAFF is crying foul on his loans. My reply:
Predatory lending?!?
Kewl, maybe you can get back all the money they took from you. ----
You don't ask for a basement inspection when you've buried bodies down there.
I'm hoping he doesn't forget the re agents he used too. Oh wait, I believe there was a few deals where he didn't use an agent.
Will he also disclose that he tried to close on all of his deals at the same time so that lenders would not be aware of his borrowing schemes?
If somehow, someway he were to 'win' some sort of judgment against his lenders due to predatory borrowing, it would just be a sign that the apocolypse is upon us.
IMHO I do not believe for a second he plans to sue but rather is positioning himself to reach a favorable settlement, optimally having the debt forgiven.
I'd say Endgame pretty much summed up Casey's reasoning. If it isn't someone else's fault, then it would be Casey's fault. And it can't be his fault if he is the victim.
What an odd thing to be doing... I guess it would have to do with trying to set Casey up as the poor, naive victim?
Sucks that those "book" tapes were posted online and there's a chunk in there that Casey talks about lying on the residency requirements... sought counsel to find out what "shade of gray" it was...
I think he was told it was indeed illegal, then decided to worry about it later...
I would think if he tries to throw lenders under the bus, they'll turn some attention back at him.
********************************** DOLLAR DECEPTION: HOW BANKS SECRETLY CREATE MONEY
July 3rd, 2007 Ellen Brown First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) was a courtroom drama worthy of a movie script. Defendant Jerome Daly opposed the bank's foreclosure on his $14,000 home mortgage loan on the ground that there was no consideration for the loan. "Consideration" ("the thing exchanged") is an essential element of a contract. Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. The courtroom proceedings were recorded by Associate Justice Bill Drexler, whose chief role, he said, was to keep order in a highly charged courtroom where the attorneys were threatening a fist fight. Drexler hadn't given much credence to the theory of the defense, until Mr. Morgan, the bank's president, took the stand. To everyone's surprise, Morgan admitted that the bank routinely created money "out of thin air" for its loans, and that this was standard banking practice. "It sounds like fraud to me," intoned Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney amid nods from the jurors. In his court memorandum, Justice Mahoney stated:
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, . . . did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note.
The court rejected the bank's claim for foreclosure, and the defendant kept his house. To Daly, the implications were enormous. If bankers were indeed extending credit without consideration – without backing their loans with money they actually had in their vaults and were entitled to lend – a decision declaring their loans void could topple the power base of the world. He wrote in a local news article:
This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State banks to be null and void.
FMW, That and the "no legal basis for income tax" and "you don't need to register your automobile" hyper-lib stories are decades old. Even if correct the nice people with the guns don't believe them and really that's all that matters.
I'm sure some low level cubicle drone in some bank has been reporting that pursuing Casey would cost more than recovery could offer. That was fine until now. Now Casey is threatening to sue them. They have nothing to loose and will let lose on him in a way that will make Friday's nasty seem itsallgoodly.
I wasn’t going to comment on this topic given the pending settlement, but I feel the need for accuracy is important as well. (If Casey doesn’t like this, oh well, we can continue where we left off...)
These mortgage challenge schemes are illegal and have been around for sometime. They offer no credible service other than pretending a secured debt can be eliminated, simply by threat of suit based on too often erroneous grounds. Having said that I myself have used discrepancies to cause a lender to rethink its position, and therefore play-ball more with a borrower (in the context of foreclosure & collections compliance). But to claim a mortgage or other secured debt can be “forgiven” simply based on minor errors is, well, stupid in the extreme.
These firms first pretend an analysis of loan docs, and then charge thousands to “represent” borrows in purported action. Naturally, suit is never engaged but the consumer’s money is long gone. Simply, what Casey is falling for is a scam and I’ve advised him of as much sometime ago.
Moreover I PERSONALLY know Countrywide (one of Casey’s lenders) isn’t going to find this tact amusing. Although since I have my own detractors who are bound to call me a liar? Check out the link below, if you’ve any further doubts?
Let's consider the fact that our looser POS retard president who has his head up his MFO ass with BS forms of Christianity went after Iraq for A. Oil B. Bullshit Babylon Belief system. Fuck you George W. Bush. You are a royal POS. YOU ARE BABYLON!
Yeah - what Akubi said at 8:45 and most of what was said at 8:35. Me - I just turn off, tune out and drop out - I watch Canadian TV ( Nimiq 1 at 91W satellite position - Bell Express Vu )
My name is Akubi nosht Aku and I haven't seen Sicko. I'm sick and tired of the BS situation in IRAQ and fuck all of you assholes for voting for this POS admin who should be lined up and shot.
Is that post a troll to drive up clicks? Here's his latetst coment.
It’s crazy… after talking to this anti-predatory lending company I am amazed what I didn’t know. After I get my papers reviewed I should know for sure. I knew there was a lot of craziness going on in the lending industry. I saw it first hand.
But I never felt like I should be the “whistle blower”, since I didn’t really know what I was doing and what is right and what wasn’t. There was A LOT of reliance on certain “professionals”. I didn’t do any of this in a vacuum.
If only ONE person would have told me that anything I’m doing is ILLEGAL or I can go to JAIL for any of my deals or loans, I would have not gone further. The best I got was “gray area” while most of my professionals / investors / associates / gurus didn’t think there was anything wrong. Perhaps this might be the time to paint the picture with all the colors.
I guess, as they say - you don’t know what you don’t know. I will not say anymore until I have everything properly researched and backed by experts.
1993 - World Trade Center Bombing (US) 6 dead 1996 - Khobar Towers Bombing (Saudi Arabia) 20 dead 1998 - US Embassy Bombings (Kenya, Tanzania) 213 dead 2000 - USS Cole Bombing (Yemen) 17 dead (no action taken against Bin Laden... right as he is planning and training operatives for 9/11)
Bush Administration
2001 - World Trade Center Destroyed 2,974 dead
...
Yep Bush is an idiot we need another Clinton Administration get back to that 2 year attack cycle we've been missing.
So once again KC proves himself to be the greater (greatest?) fool by falling for yet another scam.
His hubris really knows no bounds. Despite many earlier (and I'm sure, archived) admissions to perpetrating "liar loans" and engaging in "shady deals", the Mursed One now feigns innocence by virtue of naivete. I'm sure those opinions on his M.O. being in a "gray area" came with a wink and a nudge.
Good chance he's jerking everyone's chain, but this "anti-predatory lending company" seems to be the latest shiny he thinks might be his "Get Out of Jail Free Card".
So, it's not like KC actually grew a set by trying to turn the tables on his lenders. No, the con artist is getting conned, again.
If only ONE person would have told me that anything I’m doing is ILLEGAL or I can go to JAIL for any of my deals or loans, I would have not gone further.
As opposed to Hammar Investments where hundreds said it was illegal and promised he would go to jail for certain?
Whatever lit a fire under his murse cover ass has the wounded animal lashing out in every direction.
Reading Casey's latest post and some of the earliest ones is interesting. In the early ones he states over and over that he isn't an expert on fraud and isn't qualified to judge what it is. The term "whistle blower" is used over and over. It's like he's personally afraid of the people who loaned him money...
Murseboi sounds like he is looking for an out. God I hope he persues this.
Love to see CW or one of the other lenders decide to make an example out of him. Call the feds and say they will testify and they want to put a stop to the little shit.
First question on cross examination "Why did you fill out 9 loans saying you were going to live in the house at the same time?"
Murseboi; Dohhhhh
The jury laughs, the buzzer goes off and officer Foley escorts our hero to the holding cell for arraignment on fraud.
Casey, enjoy the next couple weeks off as judgement day is coming.
And I again would suggest you learn to suck a hard-on as it may be the only thing that will save your life in prison. But hey, you will not be embarressing your family anymore. It's all good!
If only ONE person would have told me that anything I’m doing is ILLEGAL or I can go to JAIL for any of my deals or loans, I would have not gone further. ++++++++++++++ @ Alpha Dawg,
<>OMG<> I told him in PERSON on the pod phone thingy just before his brother, Steve, ripped him a new, err I mean "embarrassed the family in public".
Ghezz, the Casey distortion field is working over time trying to define things.
I think his word for illegal when he and I spoke was,
" a shady area, not illegal."
Followed by,
"I can't tell you all of my secrets and tricks."
Disclaimer: I am still not a party to any thing, but I did party Saturday night!
Seems like KC is trying to do some damage control and spin his story a bit (way too late of course :) Does anyone believe that KC would have stopped if someone had told him it was illegal? No way, he would have rationalized it as a gray area because other people were doing it at the time.
1. Murse Boi is obviously trolling us to run up clicks and pageviews to maximize the blog income, and 'value' should he be forced to liquidate his 'baby'.
2. At 8:28 PM, LossMitPro said...
a) LMP:"These firms first pretend an analysis of loan docs, and then charge thousands to “represent” borrows in purported action. Naturally, suit is never engaged but the consumer’s money is long gone. Simply, what Casey is falling for is a scam..."
Seems to be the case, and it is a shame that sounds similar to other circumstances I have recently become aware of where threats & pseudo-legal intimidation are about all a nearly impoverished 'client' appears to get for their money.
b) LMP: "Although since I have my own detractors who are bound to call me a liar..."
I pray that no matter how heated a dialog I may be involved with, I never have to include a disclaimer like that. If felt I needed to do so because a post of mine and it's references don't stand on their own merits, I would just hold my own counsel.
At 10:48 PM, javanomad9 said... Major Al-Qaeda Attacks on US Interests
Clinton Administration
1993 - World Trade Center Bombing (US) 6 dead 1996 - Khobar Towers Bombing (Saudi Arabia) 20 dead 1998 - US Embassy Bombings (Kenya, Tanzania) 213 dead 2000 - USS Cole Bombing (Yemen) 17 dead (no action taken against Bin Laden... right as he is planning and training operatives for 9/11)
Bush Administration
2001 - World Trade Center Destroyed 2,974 dead
So you're just going to ignore the Al Quaeda attacks in 2004 (Madrid) and 2005 (London)? How about the daily attacks on our troops? There has been one attack every year between 2002 and 2005 in Indonesia connected with Al Quaeda.
Comparing Bush to Clinton is like comparing a pile of horse shit to a pile of cow shit and somehow claiming that one is better than the other. Neither of them have even mentioned the only real solution to stopping Al Quaeda, and that is pulling out of ALL Middle Eastern countries (ESPECIALLY ISRAEL).
"Neither of them have even mentioned the only real solution to stopping Al Quaeda, and that is pulling out of ALL Middle Eastern countries (ESPECIALLY ISRAEL)."
That is a Grrrreat idea...then we can all watch the genocide of entire people groups and say, well, at least we are safe in the US...poor middle easterners...We wish there was something we could do, but we are not willing to sacrifice any of our resources for the betterment of mankind. ME ME ME...
Hey guys, I'm not sure about you all, but I am EXCITED that Harry Potter will be knocked off it's place on the bestsellers list by the soon-to-be award winning "The ForeClosure Code".
I wonder if Marty "PageDaddy" Stewart and his band of strippers will be having a release party or something.
I also wonder how the opening day sells will compare to other great literary works such as "The LapDance Code"?
That is a Grrrreat idea...then we can all watch the genocide of entire people groups and say, well, at least we are safe in the US...poor middle easterners...We wish there was something we could do, but we are not willing to sacrifice any of our resources for the betterment of mankind. ME ME ME...
So, you're solution is to keep supporting Israel so that either...
a) We get attacked my Islamic extremists on our own soil because we support the Jewish invasion of their lands...or
b) We keep troops in the Middle East indefinitely in order to keep them from attacking us on our land.
Yeah...both of those sound like fantastic solutions. It's not our job to play World Police, contrary to popular belief. If we had just let the Palestinians snuff out the Israeli invasion in the first place, we wouldn't be having this debate at all.
If you want to go back even further, if we hadn't allowed the morons leading the world draw border lines through ethnically diverse regions in the Middle East after World War II, Iraq wouldn't be such a mess either. Ever wonder how the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds all ended up living together in Iraq? Pick a world leader in 1946 and blame him.
I don't give a shit what we do with it. It's not ours to give to anybody in the first place.
I'm done talking about this anyway. I've stated my piece. Nothing you say is going to change my opinion and I really don't care what yours is, plus, this is not the correct forum for this discussion.
Dan You brought it up, so here's why we're in the Middle East, oil. Sorry until the oil is gone (and Katy-bar-the door then). There will not be any departure from the Middle East. It's been the most important strategic point globally since ships were converted from coal to fuel oil (yes I know that many are nuclear now, but almoost all the nuclear ones serve as little more than mobile airbases--and most of the air power uses oil again).
Why on earth would we (the West) abandon the prize we won in World War I (and held in World War II)?
Neither of them have even mentioned the only real solution to stopping Al Quaeda, and that is pulling out of ALL Middle Eastern countries (ESPECIALLY ISRAEL).
Actually, the only real solution to stopping Al-Qaeda is to turn the entire planet into an Islamic caliphate run along strictly fundamentalist Wahhabist lines, as that's their ultimate aim - everything else (Israel, Palestine, Iraq) is merely a convenient excuse.
And since that's not going to happen, they have to be defeated by other means. (Sadly, the only truly effective ones involve infinite patience and long-term intelligence-gathering, which politicians dislike because they don't involve big explosions on the nightly TV news bulletins).
"So, you're solution is to keep supporting Israel so that either...
a) We get attacked my Islamic extremists on our own soil because we support the Jewish invasion of their lands..."
Ahhh. it's Israel's fault...I see.
"Their" lands? Not quite ace. There were Jews who had never left on the Diaspora. The Jews who moved to the Ottoman province of Palestine BOUGHT their lands.
And then, flush with their resounding victory in WWII, the Jews came out of the Displaced Persons (DP) camps, and conquered...well. what exactly did they conquer?
The British Mandate administration of the ex-Ottoman province of Palestine.
The world would be a much better place if there were no Jews in it, huh?
So your "solution" is the Final Solution,(done this time by Arabic speaking despots), while we stand by and sing Kumbay-fuckin'-ya louder and louder to drown out the screams.
"I'm done talking about this anyway. I've stated my piece. Nothing you say is going to change my opinion and I really don't care what yours is, plus, this is not the correct forum for this discussion"
Yeah...you and Hitler, two of a fuckin' kind.
BTW, shitlips, Pig-Fucker bin Laden's specific and stated beef against the US is/was our presence in Saudi Arabia...and we weren't/aren't there defending the shit-heap from the cut-dicks, but from Saddam Hussein's gang, (Arabs), and nowadays from the Iranians,(Persians)...good Muslims all.
This is like when a burglar sues’ you after he gets stuck in your chimney while attempting to rob your home.
I hope Snowflake does sue the banks; it might piss them off so much that they press the issue of Mortgage fraud and sue him back. So far it seems they have cut their losses but if this does happen I hope they go after him and have his wages garnished, not that he has a job or ever will it would be nice to know that if he ever did he would lose most of his pay check for his past crimes. They have all the evidence they need from his website.
PS: What do you think Snowflakes FICO score is now?
This is like when a burglar sues’ you after he gets stuck in your chimney while attempting to rob your home.
Has there ever been a successful lawsuit along those lines? I know of loads of attempts, but every time I look up the details I find the judge threw the case out within seconds of reading it.
But I generally agree with you: Casey has done many boneheadedly cretinous things, but actually threatening to sue his lenders must be one of his stupidest moves yet. If any of them were wavering about whether or not to sue him, the decision has just been made.
Researcher, That's the healthy attitude. The haters of haterz™ don't get this aspect. They think we stew in juices of resentment and inequity when we are in fact just turning over rocks to look at the funny creatures that scurry about in the sunshine. The Sacramento DA for instance is going to get pulled into the the Caseyworld™ Reality Distortion Field™ eventually and she has no idea what she's going to get hit with. She thinks she can hold a routine press confernce where she can have reelection happy talk about her going after mortgage fraud, yadda, yadda. The truth is we are going to ambush her with why didn't you do anything about this criminal in November and such. More fun.
This is like when a burglar sues’ you after he gets stuck in your chimney while attempting to rob your home.
Has there ever been a successful lawsuit along those lines? I know of loads of attempts, but every time I look up the details I find the judge threw the case out within seconds of reading it.
Actually, when I was back in Canada (Toronto) I heard about an interesting twist to this kind of situation.
Two burglars broke into the home of a practicing magician. Unbeknowst to them, the magician had an exotic pet license and had a pet cougar in his home. The animal was completely tame, mind you. But the burglars didn't know that.
Now its hard to separate fact from urban legend, but the story goes that while the burglars entered the bedroom to ranshack the jewelry, the cougar appeared and sat in the doorway, blocking the exit. When they saw the animal, they froze and then in a panic, climbed into the furniture. Where they apparantly stayed until the owner returned home, since there were no obvious exits from the bedroom other than the main door. Upon realizing what had happened the owner promptly called the police.
Now apparantly, the burglars filed a lawsuit against this individual claiming that there were no warning signs on the premises and that their lives were in danger from the cougar. I think the case was eventually tossed out on the grounds that warning signs pertaining to pets only apply if the pet exists in the yard area. If it only resides in the home, no warnings signs are mandated.
63 comments:
Predatory first ?
second
Interesting hole in the ground...
Murst
Poor KC
Those big, bad lenders chased him down, forced him to sign and forced him to accept money back!
Go get 'em, murse-head!
Don't the lenders have to say they've been defrauded for a crime to be prosecuted? If they have 'unclean hands' that doesn't seem likely.
Is anyone else getting the "Connecting to nwcinet.nwc.navy.mil" message when clicking on an EN feed?
So, is this
- Just another scam attempt from KC - more money back from the leders he already stole from?
- A terribly bad idea - hey, lenders, Look at me!! ?
- An element of his defense?
Predatory lending? Give me a break. Try predatory borrowing. KC is a serial fraud.
Isn't it possible that he's signalling the lenders to be wary of going after him, unless they are 100% kosher?
This is spagetti attention getting desperation. Casey is throwing everything he can think of against the wall to see what gets a reaction.
One more, I will advocate jailing the lenders if they don't go after the deadbeats with a vengeance.
I'm hoping he doesn't forget the re agents he used too. Oh wait, I believe there was a few deals where he didn't use an agent.
Will he also disclose that he tried to close on all of his deals at the same time so that lenders would not be aware of his borrowing schemes?
If somehow, someway he were to 'win' some sort of judgment against his lenders due to predatory borrowing, it would just be a sign that the apocolypse is upon us.
IMHO I do not believe for a second he plans to sue but rather is positioning himself to reach a favorable settlement, optimally having the debt forgiven.
Ho Ho Ho - It's Santa Flipper Clause
Somehow, this story gets more twisted every day.
Santa F. Clause
Casey says "wah! wah! It's always someone else's fault!"
I'd say Endgame pretty much summed up Casey's reasoning. If it isn't someone else's fault, then it would be Casey's fault. And it can't be his fault if he is the victim.
What an odd thing to be doing... I guess it would have to do with trying to set Casey up as the poor, naive victim?
Sucks that those "book" tapes were posted online and there's a chunk in there that Casey talks about lying on the residency requirements... sought counsel to find out what "shade of gray" it was...
I think he was told it was indeed illegal, then decided to worry about it later...
I would think if he tries to throw lenders under the bus, they'll turn some attention back at him.
Casey's Defense?
A good defense for filptardians.
**********************************
DOLLAR DECEPTION: HOW BANKS SECRETLY CREATE MONEY
July 3rd, 2007
Ellen Brown
First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) was a courtroom drama worthy of a movie script. Defendant Jerome
Daly opposed the bank's foreclosure on his $14,000 home mortgage loan on the ground that there was no consideration for the loan. "Consideration" ("the thing exchanged") is an essential element of a contract. Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. The courtroom proceedings were recorded by Associate Justice Bill Drexler, whose chief role, he said, was to keep order in a highly charged courtroom where the attorneys were threatening a fist fight. Drexler hadn't given much credence to the theory of the defense, until Mr. Morgan, the bank's president, took the stand. To everyone's surprise, Morgan admitted that the bank routinely created money "out of thin air" for its loans, and that this was standard banking practice. "It sounds like fraud to me," intoned Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney amid nods from the jurors. In his court memorandum, Justice Mahoney stated:
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, . . . did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note.
The court rejected the bank's claim for foreclosure, and the defendant kept his house. To Daly, the implications were enormous. If bankers were indeed extending credit without consideration – without backing their loans with money they actually had in their vaults and were entitled to lend – a decision declaring their loans void could topple the power base of the world. He wrote in a local news article:
This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State banks to be null and void.
http://www.theblackvault.com/ftopicp-525078.html
FMW,
That and the "no legal basis for income tax" and "you don't need to register your automobile" hyper-lib stories are decades old. Even if correct the nice people with the guns don't believe them and really that's all that matters.
OK the hole pic is not the spider hole of the late Iraqui dictator, maybe it's a drug/narcotic smuggling tunnel across the border?
Or might it be the back entrance to the lenders vaults?
Or kc's back yard coffee bank?
re "Iraqui"
Checking on the spelling -OED (1928) - Iraq didn't exist.
Google seems to be more comfortable with Iraqi.
The list of words with 'q' not followed by a 'u' might now add up to 4. Steph. J might beat me up on this, though.
At the rate we are going, Iraq might not exist in 2008, either.
If there were ever a shot across the bow of the lenders enticing them to come after him with everything they have this is it.
I'm sure some low level cubicle drone in some bank has been reporting that pursuing Casey would cost more than recovery could offer. That was fine until now. Now Casey is threatening to sue them. They have nothing to loose and will let lose on him in a way that will make Friday's nasty seem itsallgoodly.
Seeking to get his debts forgiven is sort of the opposite of paying back "every dirty penny".
Good thing he was never claimed he was going to pay anyone back or he'd look foolish right about now.
Rob, I'm hoping that Casey's latest post is shown to people a little further up the chain and someone finally says 'enough is enough'.
I wasn’t going to comment on this topic given the pending settlement, but I feel the need for accuracy is important as well. (If Casey doesn’t like this, oh well, we can continue where we left off...)
These mortgage challenge schemes are illegal and have been around for sometime. They offer no credible service other than pretending a secured debt can be eliminated, simply by threat of suit based on too often erroneous grounds. Having said that I myself have used discrepancies to cause a lender to rethink its position, and therefore play-ball more with a borrower (in the context of foreclosure & collections compliance). But to claim a mortgage or other secured debt can be “forgiven” simply based on minor errors is, well, stupid in the extreme.
These firms first pretend an analysis of loan docs, and then charge thousands to “represent” borrows in purported action. Naturally, suit is never engaged but the consumer’s money is long gone. Simply, what Casey is falling for is a scam and I’ve advised him of as much sometime ago.
Moreover I PERSONALLY know Countrywide (one of Casey’s lenders) isn’t going to find this tact amusing. Although since I have my own detractors who are bound to call me a liar? Check out the link below, if you’ve any further doubts?
http://www.alta.org/indynews/news.cfm?newsID=2511&print=1
~Mark
Let's consider the fact that our looser POS retard president who has his head up his MFO ass with BS forms of Christianity went after Iraq for
A. Oil
B. Bullshit Babylon Belief system.
Fuck you George W. Bush. You are a royal POS. YOU ARE BABYLON!
What a sad state this country is in. I'm f-ing tired of feeling embarrassed to be a f-ing American.
There us enough blame to go around Aku.
Just finish watching Sicko, Aku?
Yeah - what Akubi said at 8:45 and most of what was said at 8:35. Me - I just turn off, tune out and drop out - I watch Canadian TV ( Nimiq 1 at 91W satellite position - Bell Express Vu )
-K
My name is Akubi nosht Aku and I haven't seen Sicko.
I'm sick and tired of the BS situation in IRAQ and fuck all of you assholes for voting for this POS admin who should be lined up and shot.
Ah, well, don't see Sicko then. It will only piss you off even more.
Is that post a troll to drive up clicks? Here's his latetst coment.
It’s crazy… after talking to this anti-predatory lending company I am amazed what I didn’t know. After I get my papers reviewed I should know for sure. I knew there was a lot of craziness going on in the lending industry. I saw it first hand.
But I never felt like I should be the “whistle blower”, since I didn’t really know what I was doing and what is right and what wasn’t. There was A LOT of reliance on certain “professionals”. I didn’t do any of this in a vacuum.
If only ONE person would have told me that anything I’m doing is ILLEGAL or I can go to JAIL for any of my deals or loans, I would have not gone further. The best I got was “gray area” while most of my professionals / investors / associates / gurus didn’t think there was anything wrong. Perhaps this might be the time to paint the picture with all the colors.
I guess, as they say - you don’t know what you don’t know. I will not say anymore until I have everything properly researched and backed by experts.
Major Al-Qaeda Attacks on US Interests
Clinton Administration
1993 - World Trade Center Bombing (US) 6 dead
1996 - Khobar Towers Bombing (Saudi Arabia) 20 dead
1998 - US Embassy Bombings (Kenya, Tanzania) 213 dead
2000 - USS Cole Bombing (Yemen) 17 dead
(no action taken against Bin Laden...
right as he is planning and training operatives for 9/11)
Bush Administration
2001 - World Trade Center Destroyed 2,974 dead
...
Yep Bush is an idiot we need another Clinton Administration
get back to that 2 year attack cycle we've been missing.
@javanomad9
You forgot something.
Bush Administration
August 6, 2001, Presidential daily briefing entitled Bin Laden determined to strike in US.
Whoops.
So once again KC proves himself to be the greater (greatest?) fool by falling for yet another scam.
His hubris really knows no bounds. Despite many earlier (and I'm sure, archived) admissions to perpetrating "liar loans" and engaging in "shady deals", the Mursed One now feigns innocence by virtue of naivete. I'm sure those opinions on his M.O. being in a "gray area" came with a wink and a nudge.
Good chance he's jerking everyone's chain, but this "anti-predatory lending company" seems to be the latest shiny he thinks might be his "Get Out of Jail Free Card".
So, it's not like KC actually grew a set by trying to turn the tables on his lenders. No, the con artist is getting conned, again.
If only ONE person would have told me that anything I’m doing is ILLEGAL or I can go to JAIL for any of my deals or loans, I would have not gone further.
As opposed to Hammar Investments where hundreds said it was illegal and promised he would go to jail for certain?
Whatever lit a fire under his murse cover ass has the wounded animal lashing out in every direction.
Reading Casey's latest post and some of the earliest ones is interesting. In the early ones he states over and over that he isn't an expert on fraud and isn't qualified to judge what it is. The term "whistle blower" is used over and over. It's like he's personally afraid of the people who loaned him money...
@LMP:
"I wasn’t going to comment on this topic given the pending settlement, but I feel the need for accuracy is important as well."
Damn, LMP, if you don't want to talk about Casey, don't talk about Casey. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to comment here.
Murseboi sounds like he is looking for an out. God I hope he persues this.
Love to see CW or one of the other lenders decide to make an example out of him. Call the feds and say they will testify and they want to put a stop to the little shit.
First question on cross examination
"Why did you fill out 9 loans saying you were going to live in the house at the same time?"
Murseboi; Dohhhhh
The jury laughs, the buzzer goes off and officer Foley escorts our hero to the holding cell for arraignment on fraud.
Casey, enjoy the next couple weeks off as judgement day is coming.
And I again would suggest you learn to suck a hard-on as it may be the only thing that will save your life in prison. But hey, you will not be embarressing your family anymore. It's all good!
Dear Alpha Dawg,
...stories are decades old, he he.
Just trying to be helpful.
You are not saying I am naive are you? LOL
I did think it was true, though.
If only ONE person would have told me that anything I’m doing is ILLEGAL or I can go to JAIL for any of my deals or loans, I would have not gone further.
++++++++++++++
@ Alpha Dawg,
<>OMG<> I told him in PERSON on the pod phone thingy just before his brother, Steve, ripped him a new, err I mean "embarrassed the family in public".
Ghezz, the Casey distortion field is working over time trying to define things.
I think his word for illegal when he and I spoke was,
" a shady area, not illegal."
Followed by,
"I can't tell you all of my secrets and tricks."
Disclaimer: I am still not a party to any thing, but I did party Saturday night!
Seems like KC is trying to do some damage control and spin his story a bit (way too late of course :)
Does anyone believe that KC would have stopped if someone had told him it was illegal? No way, he would have rationalized it as a gray area because other people were doing it at the time.
1. Murse Boi is obviously trolling us to run up clicks and pageviews to maximize the blog income, and 'value' should he be forced to liquidate his 'baby'.
2. At 8:28 PM, LossMitPro said...
a) LMP:"These firms first pretend an analysis of loan docs, and then charge thousands to “represent” borrows in purported action. Naturally, suit is never engaged but the consumer’s money is long gone. Simply, what Casey is falling for is a scam..."
Seems to be the case, and it is a shame that sounds similar to other circumstances I have recently become aware of where threats & pseudo-legal intimidation are about all a nearly impoverished 'client' appears to get for their money.
b) LMP: "Although since I have my own detractors who are bound to call me a liar..."
I pray that no matter how heated a dialog I may be involved with, I never have to include a disclaimer like that. If felt I needed to do so because a post of mine and it's references don't stand on their own merits, I would just hold my own counsel.
At 10:48 PM, javanomad9 said...
Major Al-Qaeda Attacks on US Interests
Clinton Administration
1993 - World Trade Center Bombing (US) 6 dead
1996 - Khobar Towers Bombing (Saudi Arabia) 20 dead
1998 - US Embassy Bombings (Kenya, Tanzania) 213 dead
2000 - USS Cole Bombing (Yemen) 17 dead
(no action taken against Bin Laden...
right as he is planning and training operatives for 9/11)
Bush Administration
2001 - World Trade Center Destroyed 2,974 dead
So you're just going to ignore the Al Quaeda attacks in 2004 (Madrid) and 2005 (London)? How about the daily attacks on our troops? There has been one attack every year between 2002 and 2005 in Indonesia connected with Al Quaeda.
Comparing Bush to Clinton is like comparing a pile of horse shit to a pile of cow shit and somehow claiming that one is better than the other. Neither of them have even mentioned the only real solution to stopping Al Quaeda, and that is pulling out of ALL Middle Eastern countries (ESPECIALLY ISRAEL).
Dan,
Technically, the 2005 London attacks were because UK women are slags who wear short skirts and drink too much.
"Neither of them have even mentioned the only real solution to stopping Al Quaeda, and that is pulling out of ALL Middle Eastern countries (ESPECIALLY ISRAEL)."
That is a Grrrreat idea...then we can all watch the genocide of entire people groups and say, well, at least we are safe in the US...poor middle easterners...We wish there was something we could do, but we are not willing to sacrifice any of our resources for the betterment of mankind. ME ME ME...
Hey guys, I'm not sure about you all, but I am EXCITED that Harry Potter will be knocked off it's place on the bestsellers list by the soon-to-be award winning "The ForeClosure Code".
I wonder if Marty "PageDaddy" Stewart and his band of strippers will be having a release party or something.
I also wonder how the opening day sells will compare to other great literary works such as "The LapDance Code"?
At 7:10 AM, Mike said...
That is a Grrrreat idea...then we can all watch the genocide of entire people groups and say, well, at least we are safe in the US...poor middle easterners...We wish there was something we could do, but we are not willing to sacrifice any of our resources for the betterment of mankind. ME ME ME...
So, you're solution is to keep supporting Israel so that either...
a) We get attacked my Islamic extremists on our own soil because we support the Jewish invasion of their lands...or
b) We keep troops in the Middle East indefinitely in order to keep them from attacking us on our land.
Yeah...both of those sound like fantastic solutions. It's not our job to play World Police, contrary to popular belief. If we had just let the Palestinians snuff out the Israeli invasion in the first place, we wouldn't be having this debate at all.
If you want to go back even further, if we hadn't allowed the morons leading the world draw border lines through ethnically diverse regions in the Middle East after World War II, Iraq wouldn't be such a mess either. Ever wonder how the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds all ended up living together in Iraq? Pick a world leader in 1946 and blame him.
Excuse me, I was wrong. The Middle East was divided after World War I, so the world leaders in the late teens, early 20's are to blame.
So you are saying we should give it all back to turkey then?
I don't give a shit what we do with it. It's not ours to give to anybody in the first place.
I'm done talking about this anyway. I've stated my piece. Nothing you say is going to change my opinion and I really don't care what yours is, plus, this is not the correct forum for this discussion.
Rob, can you please create a thread for these guys?
Dan
You brought it up, so here's why we're in the Middle East, oil. Sorry until the oil is gone (and Katy-bar-the door then). There will not be any departure from the Middle East. It's been the most important strategic point globally since ships were converted from coal to fuel oil (yes I know that many are nuclear now, but almoost all the nuclear ones serve as little more than mobile airbases--and most of the air power uses oil again).
Why on earth would we (the West) abandon the prize we won in World War I (and held in World War II)?
Neither of them have even mentioned the only real solution to stopping Al Quaeda, and that is pulling out of ALL Middle Eastern countries (ESPECIALLY ISRAEL).
Actually, the only real solution to stopping Al-Qaeda is to turn the entire planet into an Islamic caliphate run along strictly fundamentalist Wahhabist lines, as that's their ultimate aim - everything else (Israel, Palestine, Iraq) is merely a convenient excuse.
And since that's not going to happen, they have to be defeated by other means. (Sadly, the only truly effective ones involve infinite patience and long-term intelligence-gathering, which politicians dislike because they don't involve big explosions on the nightly TV news bulletins).
Dan;
"So, you're solution is to keep supporting Israel so that either...
a) We get attacked my Islamic extremists on our own soil because we support the Jewish invasion of their lands..."
Ahhh. it's Israel's fault...I see.
"Their" lands? Not quite ace.
There were Jews who had never left on the Diaspora.
The Jews who moved to the Ottoman province of Palestine BOUGHT their lands.
And then, flush with their resounding victory in WWII, the Jews came out of the Displaced Persons (DP) camps, and conquered...well. what exactly did they conquer?
The British Mandate administration of the ex-Ottoman province of Palestine.
The world would be a much better place if there were no Jews in it, huh?
So your "solution" is the Final Solution,(done this time by Arabic speaking despots), while we stand by and sing Kumbay-fuckin'-ya louder and louder to drown out the screams.
"I'm done talking about this anyway. I've stated my piece. Nothing you say is going to change my opinion and I really don't care what yours is, plus, this is not the correct forum for this discussion"
Yeah...you and Hitler, two of a fuckin' kind.
BTW, shitlips, Pig-Fucker bin Laden's specific and stated beef against the US is/was our presence in Saudi Arabia...and we weren't/aren't there defending the shit-heap from the cut-dicks, but from Saddam Hussein's gang, (Arabs), and nowadays from the Iranians,(Persians)...good Muslims all.
This is like when a burglar sues’ you after he gets stuck in your chimney while attempting to rob your home.
I hope Snowflake does sue the banks; it might piss them off so much that they press the issue of Mortgage fraud and sue him back. So far it seems they have cut their losses but if this does happen I hope they go after him and have his wages garnished, not that he has a job or ever will it would be nice to know that if he ever did he would lose most of his pay check for his past crimes. They have all the evidence they need from his website.
PS: What do you think Snowflakes FICO score is now?
This is like when a burglar sues’ you after he gets stuck in your chimney while attempting to rob your home.
Has there ever been a successful lawsuit along those lines? I know of loads of attempts, but every time I look up the details I find the judge threw the case out within seconds of reading it.
But I generally agree with you: Casey has done many boneheadedly cretinous things, but actually threatening to sue his lenders must be one of his stupidest moves yet. If any of them were wavering about whether or not to sue him, the decision has just been made.
So my wife asked me: "What's going on in the Caseyverse?"
"Well, Casey is going to sue his lenders because he says they lied to him."
That hung in the air for a while. Then we both burst out laughing.
You've got to admit, the absurdity of it all is good for a laugh if nothing else. I think we've finally found the limit of chutzpah.
Researcher,
That's the healthy attitude. The haters of haterz™ don't get this aspect. They think we stew in juices of resentment and inequity when we are in fact just turning over rocks to look at the funny creatures that scurry about in the sunshine. The Sacramento DA for instance is going to get pulled into the the Caseyworld™ Reality Distortion Field™ eventually and she has no idea what she's going to get hit with. She thinks she can hold a routine press confernce where she can have reelection happy talk about her going after mortgage fraud, yadda, yadda. The truth is we are going to ambush her with why didn't you do anything about this criminal in November and such. More fun.
This is like when a burglar sues’ you after he gets stuck in your chimney while attempting to rob your home.
Has there ever been a successful lawsuit along those lines? I know of loads of attempts, but every time I look up the details I find the judge threw the case out within seconds of reading it.
Actually, when I was back in Canada (Toronto) I heard about an interesting twist to this kind of situation.
Two burglars broke into the home of a practicing magician. Unbeknowst to them, the magician had an exotic pet license and had a pet cougar in his home. The animal was completely tame, mind you. But the burglars didn't know that.
Now its hard to separate fact from urban legend, but the story goes that while the burglars entered the bedroom to ranshack the jewelry, the cougar appeared and sat in the doorway, blocking the exit. When they saw the animal, they froze and then in a panic, climbed into the furniture. Where they apparantly stayed until the owner returned home, since there were no obvious exits from the bedroom other than the main door. Upon realizing what had happened the owner promptly called the police.
Now apparantly, the burglars filed a lawsuit against this individual claiming that there were no warning signs on the premises and that their lives were in danger from the cougar. I think the case was eventually tossed out on the grounds that warning signs pertaining to pets only apply if the pet exists in the yard area. If it only resides in the home, no warnings signs are mandated.
Nonetheless, a somewhat comical story.
More wormsign in the comments; Casey is in full-on NOT MY FAULT! NOBODY TOLD ME! mode.
Post a Comment