Simi Valley house blaze displaces 8 people[From staff reports Sunday, July 1, 2007]
...
No one was injured in the incident, but smoke damage was reported throughout the home's second floor. The Red Cross was on hand to assist eight displaced people, reported as five adults and three children on the Fire Department's Web site.
...
----
Five adults just trying to make ends meet and raise some kids and give them a good education.
155 comments:
Cheap New Post Dawg!
No fire on the FIRST Floor?
Wagga Be A-Laggin'
Wagga be First FIRST. Again
Good lord. Way too early for the first/murst thing.
At any rate, 5 adults, 3 kids? 16 units to respond? How big is that house?
Now, now Dawg - you mean you don't live with your mom, wife, brother and his wife?
It's the American way!
@ schnapps,
Big enough to house the straw buyer, the seller, the Appraiser, and the Mortgage Broker and Real Estate Clerk, who are from the same family through bloodline or by marriage and split the 'cash back' at close 5 ways.
tee hee
I am tempted to turn off AdBlocker and resume javascript so that I may gloriously click on Fliptard's site all day. Drive the sitemeter WAY up so that when KC loses his baby again it will hurt all the more.
Crisp and Cole defaults now at $24 million:
http://bakersfieldbubble.blogspot.com
t said...
Wagga be First FIRST. Again
Find another identity, punk. This one's already taken.
Mornin', T! (the real one)
It ain't how much you make, it's how much you hold on to.....
Mr. Crisp did not learn that lesson
Mornin', Schnappy!
Dude,
Crisp & Casey really are two of a kind. Fraud plus no work equals Casey. Fraud plus hard work equals David. They both took whatever they could steal and kept doubling down until they busted.
@ Casey's Sex Life 8:24--
You know, I'm kind of ashamed I didn't think of that myself. If it weren't for the fact that going to IAFF makes my skin crawl nowadays, I'd call for some Massive Focused Haterz Action(TM) to poke our dead little pony a few more times online before LMP gets a hold of him. Then again, perhaps they w/stronger stomachs for sociopathic Serinisms would be better equipped to bug the little 'tard.
Your concern is touching - the landlord/owner will likely be 'liable' (not 'libel,' one hopes), as the insurance company may find such conditions as a family living under one roof cause to not pay for the damages, thus at least not burdening the shareholders with anything but a revenue stream.
And of course, there was absolutely nothing in the article you linked to that suggested the children were not American citizens - which makes your linking to the second article reasonable.
Which just happens to include the following text - 'Publication Date: 1995-07-00'
Nothing wrong with the information presented, of course - especially since at that time in NYC, the burden of illegal Irish immigrant children was much higher than today.
Intriguingly, about a year ago, the IHT had an article describing how the illegal Irish immigrants were returning to Ireland. It seems as if the increased Homeland Security directives, the lack of good paying work, and ever increasing costs of simply living around NYC was leading to the first documented case (according to the author, at least) of immigration being reversed. It seems as if the illegal Irish found Ireland a better place to raise their children (seems to have also had something to do with universal Irish health care).
But of course, we have the EU to thank for lifting the burden of all those illegal Irish from the backs of American taxpayers.
But if you would like to read something from this decade (not to mention this century), maybe the link at http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/3258766.html would be useful.
Especially this extract about how the NYT reporter misrepresented the facts in his 'hard hitting' articles -
'The other interesting thing to note about Booker T. was that, NCLB aside, there wasn’t any overcrowding in the school: According to the New York City School Construction Authority, the school was built to hold 1,104 students and was still, officially, 13 children under capacity.
The I.S. 192 building, which Winerip complained had a double-digit increase in its student body, was built for 1,527 students, meaning it still had room to spare after welcoming all the new students in 2003 (only a third of whom, as we saw, actually arrived because of NCLB). And while it isn’t clear why Winerip chose I.S. 89 to profile for his first anti-NCLB installment, it is clear why the city’s education department was steering children in that direction: there was room for an additional 159 students. (After several weeks of school, another 6th-grade teacher was added, further minimizing the impact caused by the seven children who transferred to that grade under NCLB.)'
Bring on the Sunday morning fireworks, Dawg! The only Massive Focused Action I have planned for today include reading EN (lame commenting is my specialty), drinking beer and clicking on IAFF a billion times!
Sweeeet!
Yes I am very glad to have the day off, and be rested now and ready for MASSIVE FOCUSED HATING>>
I'm just gonna dig on the Special Haterzcast right now. It has a rather exuberant tone.
At 10:03 AM, TK said...
I'm just gonna dig on the Special Haterzcast right now. It has a rather exuberant tone
Tk, there are some periods of silence from me when I wasnt dealing with a little one, that I was kinda listening but I was staring at my hand and started wondering about the complexities of moving a finger.
Right down to the neuron's firing, with the flow of the electrical impulse going to that muscle to make the finer move or the hand flex. At what speed the electrical impulse was moving. And how in the brain things had to interract to make that neuron fire and send the electrical impulse.
Then I went to what the nerves must be constructed of to make it possible for the electrical impulse to travel.....I started to get into all of the decisions past ancestors must have made for me to be at this one moment in time to sit there and contemplate the movement of my one hand...all of the billions, infinite possibilities that leads to you being right where you are at this one moment in time.
Then I came back to earth and started talking on the haterzcast again.
And yes I was way hopped up on meds last night...my back felt great...flexeril and vicodin baby.
Seriously great haterzcast.
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=34513&cmd=tc
CHJTS,
You seemed on your game, not impaired in any way. Would never have guessed...I'm a drooling mute when on pain meds.
I love that part where Annie is talking and she finishes her comment and you and Mark are totally somewhere else. There's just this dead silence. Annie's like "HELLO?"
Very interesting Haterzcast.
No action on IAFF. I think he's on his way home.
Dawg! Where's that other reveal already!
Casey left a message late last nite on dawgs thread he will be in Aussie 2 more weeks,is that really him.
Casey does not have the balls to post here. He reads this blog, but no WAY he'd post here, especially after last night.
just listened to the haterzcast ... great job guys!
This is Casey's favorite site, but he has never EVER posted here, nor would he ever. He liked to pretend for months that he didn't even know there were hater sites out there and would steal material from them.
Interestingly I think he's a total Caseypedia addict. He linked to it and then changed his mind at the last minute because they didn't suit "house rules". Whatever, Caseypedia contains a hell of a lot of uncomfortable material, and the link-to was a lame attempt to appear unfazed by the fact that he is finally being picked apart.
8:56 AM, T said..
Sorry T, that was a typo. Fast twitch fingers & too much blood in the caffeine stream...
Besides, lower case is a deliberate sign of disrespect, & you know I would never do that.
And I'm more of a hoon than a punk.
Radar sends his love to Nacho, that is if Nacho is a girl.
@Rob Dawg
WFF is all this LOSSMITPRO shit about?It seems to me that he is latching on to snowflake just to create his 15 minutes of fame.
Why are u Facilitating him?
This guy sounds like a bigger Fucktard than KC.At Least Duane sounds like he cares, and is not in it for his 15 minutes.I have followed KC from the beginning and I Think That this shithead is going too far.
I Know that KC is a total arsehole, but do u think that he deserves all of this shit?
CHJTS & LossMIT,
The gigglefest II entertains me... you guys need to have a beer together when this is all done.
Crisp & Casey really are two of a kind. Fraud plus no work equals Casey. Fraud plus hard work equals David.
HMMMM...Interesting conumdrum. Is it better to be a lazy crook or a hard working con man?
Casey was truely lazy and amassed $2.2MM in defaults. C&C worked really hard and amassed $24MM in defaults.
It took C&C a lot longer, and a lot more work, but the rewards were richer. for CS, there was little work involved.
LMP is a normally levelheaded guy who has just had enough of this nonsense and is prepared to force issues. We all were getting screwed by loose money and greed and amateurs in the housing business. Now we are getting screwed by a leagal and law enforcement system that is doing worse than not doing their job, they are covering their ears at the screaming for them to do their jobs. LMP is going to rub their noses in it. Judges don't like their courts tied up with little 5 digit business suits but what they really don't like is when the complaint makes it clear that the defendant has been doing this over the last 6 months when he should have been locked up on criminal charges. The questions will be for the DAs office and not the civil participants.
This is an open forum. People post here and the dawg pack takes care of them as seen fit. Not everyone follows the same path.
Has it ever turned out the worst people are willing to accept about Casey has ever been enough?
>> Crisp & Casey really are two of a kind. Fraud plus no work equals Casey. Fraud plus hard work equals David.
Hard work and better sense of timing. Crisp got started while the boom had legs. Casey literally started at the peak.
The scary part is that if Casey had done the deed 12 months ago, he probably would have made a killing The end would be the same -- he would double down until he bust, but the bust would be 8 figures instead of a paltry 7 figures.
@Rob Dawg
Point taken Rob.
I just still think that this guy is still in it for his 15 minutes.
He cane in ,offered to help KC and then fucked him over.Whatever you think about snowflake. That is not a nice thing to do to anybody.(including snowflake).
I Know that KC is a total arsehole, but do u think that he deserves all of this shit?
YES!!! and a whole lot more. There are lots of people who:
- Game the system
- Lie to get a mortgage
- Borrow money on false premises
- Screw their families for money
- Run away from their wives
- Try to steal from CashCall
- Believe they can get rich quick
- Think they are smarter/more special than everyone else
- Ask for advice then stick a finger in the eye of the advice giver.
Most of these people don't do all of this, and most don't announce that they are doing it under the pretense of helping others avoid foreclosure.
He's mentall ill and needs to be stopped for his own good, the good of his family, and the good of the community.
He cane in ,offered to help KC and then fucked him over.
LMP's contention is that KC fucked him over first, by blatantly backtracking on a promise (now there's a surprise). Which I believe is partially the basis for the lawsuit.
He cane in ,offered to help KC and then fucked him over.
More than likely, he and Casey had an agreement and Casey wanted to do things on his own terms or changed his mind or done some other bonehead move. CS has the capacity for (and history of) turning a potential ally into an enemy.
Key is that we don't know what happened! Lost Mittens might be a hot head who overreact.....Maybe LMP is the king of haterz and really duped KC to get information out of him.....Maybe CS lied and cheated LMP.......Who knows?
But the end result will be good entertainment. After all, isn;t that what this is al about?
Off topic, but for aviation buffs there's the ramp-up to the 787 rollout.
6/30 - 707
7/1 - 717
and so forth.
Just to make sure Casey doesn't edit or decide not to post the truth I submitted:
Folks,
Casey knows exactly what's going on here. One minute, he's a guy with a 131 IQ, the next he feigns naivete for everything he doesn't want to own up to.
He's lazy and this is further proof his laziness is catching up with him. I feel no sympathy for the kid. He could have listened to wise advice but dug a hole SO deep, he can't dig out.
The haterz aren't the reason for his problems, HE is the problem. Stop enabling him.
Go to http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/archives/2006/11/casey-serin-stupid-real-estate-decision.html. When you find the article, read it. If this doesn't lay out who Casey Serin really is, then you are delusional. Casey is not this poor little victim. He is very aware of everything he is doing.
Don't believe me? Fine...go to the article in question AND THEN tell me I am wrong.
----------------------------------
This is fact and very relevant to who Casey really is. Love the naivete...it's pathetic.
Can the enablerz (not supporterz - ENABLERZ!) stop saying Mark fucked Casey over? That is a bunch of HORSESHIT.
If your only basis for that opinion is what Casey is saying, you are sad little sheeple.
From Sunshine on Fliptard thread.
At 1:54 PM, Anonymous said...
You guys are all losers. You're just making up all that Galina stuff. Where's the proof that you're communicating with her?
At 1:58 PM, FlyingMonkeyWarrior said...
You guys are all losers. You're just making up all that Galina stuff. Where's the proof that you're communicating with her?
+++++++++++____________-----------
Hi Casey,
Welcome to EN.
FMW
No comments in 17 hours?? Is young dumbfuck on a plane?
Holy shit! I unplug for two days to ride rollercoasters and the Casey hits the fan!
(running off to listen to talkshoe)
If your only basis for that opinion is what Casey is saying, you are sad little sheeple.
DOLPH! I'm ashamed of you. We all know that Casey always tells the truth. Casey never hides anything. Casey can be trusted with any secret. If you give hime money he will hold it for you with complete honesty.
If there is a contradiction in what he says, it's either a misunderstandig or his naivete causing his poor little self to be confused.
Stop picking on Casey. He needs your support now more than ever!
From Aspeth's blog one is led to believe that Casey will not in fact come home, but rather he will do the world tour...
Really, as long as there's a money supply, who can stop him?
That is why Galina needs to close the bank account. 100% success on her part = 100% failure on his. If mom sends a non-transferable ticket to SFO, he has no choice.
Yeah, I'd close the account out of spite. Let the little shit know what it feels like to have his money supply cut off (or at least, not readily accessible--we know he has $23k stashed somewhere, but apparently, their joint checking account is the only one he has ATM/debit access to right now).
Something that's always bothered me is the updated spreadsheet in Jan. A new Macy's charge account(Galina's). If you know you're already in debt - that you can't even pay the minimum on all of the other cards you have AND that you obviously don't have the cash to buy something at Macys WHY OH WHY do you open a Macys account when you KNOW you can't pay for it?!!!!
In my book, that's theft. Am I missing something? You might say that it's only $128 but, come on, it's outright theft.
Rant off
Yep, I think Casey is never coming back. Said it here yesterday.
He is addicted to "The Deal", no matter where.
I just hope he carefully chooses countries with prisons as nice as the ones here in the US as his destinations on his 'sofa surfing world tour'.
I really wonder if the identity theft thing with CashCall (multiple e-mail addresses) is the "other bombshell" that Duane and/or Rob was referring to.
If Gaysey screwed his own parents for $23,000 -- it's not out of the question...
@ Benoit™ ...
I Do you mean Casey taking out many different CashCall loans as other people?
OMFG
He is not that bad is he?
That would be like living in 8 houses, as owner occupied, at the same time in different states?
Oh, he said did that.
I guess the separation hearing and collections calls and July 5th Judge decision will have to commence with out him.
How many whores do you think Casey banged in Australia?
Want irony? Galina went from on-her-knees money-grubber to on-her-knees toilet-scrubber.
Watching Casey blow money on hotels, rental cars, and cheap whores has been way better than reading about his pondscum-covered foreclosures. I'm hoping Casey gets home and gives Galina SWEEEET genital herpes! Win-win for team Casey
Hey, Anon 3:21--You a little bitter about the "present" last month's drunk date gave you? Man, quit projecting your bad experiences on to G; it's more than unbecoming, you wee troll.
BTW, as of today, Casey still hasn't made an effort to renew the IAFF domain name. It expires on September 6th, which is coming up fast...
If any cyber-squatters are reading this....... hehe. ;-)
Listening to the Haterzcast - LOL @ Annie "irritainment..."
Rob Dawg said...
LMP is a normally levelheaded guy who has just had enough of this nonsense and is prepared to force issues. We all were getting screwed by loose money and greed and amateurs in the housing business. Now we are getting screwed by a leagal and law enforcement system that is doing worse than not doing their job, they are covering their ears at the screaming for them to do their jobs. LMP is going to rub their noses in it. Judges don't like their courts tied up with little 5 digit business suits but what they really don't like is when the complaint makes it clear that the defendant has been doing this over the last 6 months when he should have been locked up on criminal charges. The questions will be for the DAs office and not the civil participants.
-----------------------------------
This court issue is going to be interesting to watch unfold. I personally am interested in how the court handles this.
I do have a few problems with the way Mark is going about this. In my opinion Mark is being so reckless and have done s couple of things that may get this all thrown right out of court.
If for some reason this doesn't get thrown out of court, my biggest concern is that once the ball gets rolling and hands begin to get forced, peoples options diminish. I would not like to see the D.A be put in a position where they have to charge Galina as well.
You and I have a better understanding of the position Galina has been put in, but that is because we have followed this matter very closely for 10 months and have come to a deeper understanding of the depth of Caseys manipulation. There is a sad reality that Galina signed certain documents and was aware that Casey was lying about the other 7 loans.
I am not proposing that Galina was in on the scam, but the reality is that she has broken the law as well in deed and knowledge and I would not like to see her dragged into this, simply because a hand was played and the DA had to bring charges against those involved, which unfortunately includes Galina.
I would hope that in the end, all the circumstances would come out and a rightful measure of justice would assign the blame properly, but in the meantime it could cause alot of extra legal problems and misery for Galina.
It is kinda like the old saying, to not ask a question in court, that you do not already have the answer too. By the same token, don't start legal proceedings to which you are not sure of the total scope and outcome.
Benoit™
If you hadn't opened your mouth you'd probably have been able to just snap it up. Now there's gonna be competition. Casey, as we all know, will forget to renew. And then say "I need to probably work on that".
RE Galina,
I think a very fair argument can be made on her behalf that her overbearing manipulative husband forced her to do certain things.
@ TK: If you hadn't opened your mouth you'd probably have been able to just snap it up.
The info's been up on CaseyPedia for a while, plus others have reiterated it here as well. I just wanted to remind you-know-who that if he doesn't... err... "take care of his baby", he can expect it to die in roughly 68 days. :-Þ
@tk: Interestingly I think he's a total Caseypedia addict. He linked to it
...and he updated the link when I edited the page, changing the section titles and breaking his link to the LossMitPro transcript.
He was watching that page like a hawk.
and then changed his mind at the last minute because they didn't suit "house rules".
Heh. Like CaseyPedia *needs* his link. It's been getting sweet media linkage of its own.
Great haterzcast last night. LossMitPro speaks a lot more directly than he writes; and it cracks me up when he and CHJTS dissolve into fits of laughter.
"How did you get the contract?"
"Casey gave it to me."
"He's a moron."
I agree that a fair arguement can be made that her overbearing husband forced her to do things.
Unfortunately, those arguements are made in the process of a defense trial. When it comes to issuing charges, a DA doesn't make those evaluations, especially when their hand is being forced. They will go ahead and charge all involved and let a jury weigh the evidence and circumstances. A trial or legal troubles for Galina is still a huge burden on her at this point, regardless if in the future she is proven to be innocent.
I do hope that Galina has retained legal help and handed over all evidence for safe keeping.
I know I may have missed it due to the numerous posts. But if Aspeth's comments are accurate about Casey taking Mom's cash to go on to another country as opposed to coming home, did anyone caution her not to give this Slug cash? Only a non-refundable ticket? Sorry skimming quickly - kids eat up so much time. :-)
Racer Rabbit @ 3:47 PM:
”I do have a few problems with the way Mark is going about this. In my opinion Mark is being so reckless and have done s couple of things that may get this all thrown right out of court.”
I can respect this view, it is understandable albeit uninformed.
Foremost courts don’t throw out cases as easily as you may think, secondly even “IF” your presumption is accurate a dismissal motion is six (6) to nine (9) months away, and involuntary dismissal is appealable which adds up to another year of court wrangling. In the meantime, the wheels they keep a-turning.
As to your notions that Galina is somehow at risk? Nope! But for your consideration (re-posted again, for the umpteenth time) below is what I provided readers in the ”Black Shriveled Soulless Heart” thread (@9:20 AM) back on the 19th of last month, following conformation with Criminal Defense counsel Chris Wing (Dallas being the only property Galina sign a 1003):
“In the case of Dallas: the lender REQUIRED Galina to sign (an express lender stipulation she cannot be prosecuted for), credit considerations were not an issue, the LTV (Loan To Value) was 65% (plenty of lender liquidation room), Casey put down over $27,003.23, $11,500 was escrowed for repairs, and the lender was aware of Casey’s activity. There was no mortgage fraud on the part of Galina Serin.
“These facts are verified on the HUD-1, I have reviewed this document, I have consulted with competent counsel regarding the issues, and have obtained a legal position regarding the result! Plus, I am qualified (professionally) to make an assessment of the lending and asset recovery criteria. This is why I can state what I have with high certainty, in the extreme.
“Please, unless you are a lawyer (or have consulted one specific to the issues) and have had the attorney review facts and/or supporting documents? Making mild or wild speculation without disclosing that’s what your statement is, can harm the innocent and cause other problems.”
Hope this helps.
~Mark
I want to see Duane hook-up with Galina, if only just to piss off Casey. Who's with me here?
Rob, can you do something about these anons that leave random comments like the one above?
Mark,
I wouldn't consider my comments to be speculations either mild or wild. I look at the information that is available and make comments. I also am open to any information that is conveyed in a considerate response.
I am glad to know that Galina didn't sign any of the forms related to the loans on the Dallas house. I still have concern for her being dragged into the Casey blast oven.
Forgive me if I do not fully trust all of your Pro Se actions. I am not saying this to rip on you, but I lost alittle confidence in the matter when I heard you tell Casey that he would need to be in Superior Court on July 5th, when you were filing an ex-parte motion. That does not compute.
I am not sure how things are working in California, but in other parts of the country there seems to be a prejudice against Pro Se's. That prejudice increases when the courts see a Pro Se providing the other party with extremely incorrect or misleading information.
As I said earlier I am very interested to see how this plays out in court and especially how the California court handles this. There is a difference between what you and I think is correct and how a court looks at something. Alot of lawyers end up finding out their interpretation or perspective of the law in a specific case was wrong, or at least interpretated differently than they believed it would be.
"I want to see Duane hook-up with Galina, if only just to piss off Casey. Who's with me here?"
Mmmm, if I remember correctly, Duane's quite married. However, I'd like to see Galina end up w/SOMEONE better than Turdflake, if and when she gets through the mess her childish, selfish shit of a hubby has put her through, both emotionally and financially.
lossmitpro:
Based on what you said on the TalkCast, I agree that if Marty and Casey ran the complaint by an attorney, they would probably be advised to settle. But that's only if they disclosed everything to the attorney and didn't misrepresent that the allegations in the complaint weren't true. People rarely do this--they try to hide things, paint the picture very rosy, etc., and it always ends up backfiring... Their loss!
At 4:40 PM, Schnapps said...
Rob, can you do something about these anons that leave random comments like the one above?
Best approach is to ignore them. Rob steps in when they go way out of bounds, but if you want to have an open discussion then things like this will pop up.
LMP,
Be extremely careful about what you post here regarding your suit - particularly, anything that can be construed as statements to the effect that you are filing this suit for reasons other than to be "made whole" by the defendant. Likewise, I wouldn't post anything about representations made by Galina's defense counsel - did she tell you he said all this?
@Benoit... SSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Why bring this to light... SHHHHHH..
(I already have it on my namedrop account.. if he forgets, and I get it, I will donate it to Galina..) WOuldnt THAT be a hoot..
At 3:35 PM, Benoit™ said...
BTW, as of today, Casey still hasn't made an effort to renew the IAFF domain name. It expires on September 6th, which is coming up fast...
If any cyber-squatters are reading this....... hehe. ;-)
Is Rob passed out drunk in a lounge chair? Awfully quiet here today or is he at the Airport waiting for the little MurseBoy?
Segfault,
Based on the one-paragraph excerpt LMP published from Casey and Marty's "contract," an attorney will advise to settle and disappear very quickly and very quietly. I believe that "contract" will be part of LMP's filing.
Of course, by that point it could be too late. If the "contract" is part of court records, it will be public knowledge. Its existance and knowledge will also tie any attorney's hands. An attorney is required to act in the client's best interest and follow client's direction as necessary, but the one thing an attorney cannot do is lie or misrepresent facts. This means no attorney can ever stand up and say that these two had no intent to conceal income or assets, or to avoid creditors of the tax authorities. It says in black and white that they do. The best an attorney can do is fail to mention it, fail to make claims of "innocence" and hope nobody notices.
The paragrah, for those who have forgotten:
For obvious reasons, due to potential creditor and IRS issues, Casey’s personal name will not appear on anything that could jeopardize any assets, accounts, etc. being seized or frozen. Steps will be taken to ensure this, as in 2006, Marty lost over $400,000 in assets as a result of his business partner’s actions, and their name being on primary accounts and assets.”
Also, interestingly enough, Marty's decision to include irrelevant personal tidbits in the contract could make his entire personal financial situation subject to investigation and discovery. All his "NDAs" will be worthless.
Who might sue Marty?
Perhaps mama Serin. She might decide that she was defrauded. She might decide that part of the fraud was Marty misrepresenting himself. She might use that little tidbit in the contract as a way to prove he misrepresented himself.
Truth is, as I see it, Galina or even Casey himself could use that silly little personal disclosure.
Probably the $23K she's lost on this mess wouldn't justify going after him, but if I were his counsel, I'd be trying to bury that contract as deep as humanly possible. I'd advise to settle with an agreement to no further disclosure.
-btc
Passed out on a lawn chair sounds good about now. As previously mentioned more than one brother in law showed up to tour the home improvements. Then "visiting" and right now I'm at "grandmas" house doing a 10.4.10 update and "visiting" some more with relatives. Oh boy, go home and trim hedges then 5:30 tomorrow get my kid back off to UCLA.
Was Galina forced to open the Macys accout?(re: my earlier post)
If that's the case then fraud issues are apparent. Is that the case on the Macys charge card? Fraud?
If not, then what was so important to buy at Macys that for which wasn't worth waiting?
The Real Wagga™ said...
Besides, lower case is a deliberate sign of disrespect, & you know I would never do that.
<3
Radar sends his love to Nacho, that is if Nacho is a girl.
Nach is a boy... but he'll take whatever affection he can get cause he's all self-absorbed and shit.
Another interesting thing about that contract snippet, is that it makes it clear Casey is at least *aware* of what the IRS could do to him, and that he's concerned - which flies in the face of his "Whattthey gonna do? I file late and pay a fine, everyone does it" attitude.
Unless you apply The Casey Evasion Technique™. In his mind, he was talking about his 2006 1040 taxes, not the upcoming taxes, where taxes might be owed from forgiven debt. So, he was'nt lying, technically, as he's not worried about the THOSE taxes.
But to judge from this contract? Oh, he's worried about next year - and entered into a tax evasion conspiracy to deal with it.
Oh, they're in deep, deep shit.
Macy's has the best collection of MURSES,you don't think the Gasey shops at Walmart.
@ Alison and the Macys account:
She and Casey bought sheets....denaial at it's best/worst. That has been roundly discussed.
Rob, can you do something about these anons that leave random comments like the one above?
That's the problem wiht free speech, it's free for everyone, even if what they want to say is stupid.
We'd all like to get rid of the trolls.....are we willing to have a heavily moderated forum? Looks like no. Try Nigel or Casey for moderation.
Hey JudgeJudy,
Sorry that was me you say passed out.
New post up at my blog about a couple of really nice realtor(tm) that want to be just like casey.
Rob if you would like you can make it a post topic here.....it is right up your alley.
Racer Rabbit @ 4:49 PM:
”I am not sure how things are working in California, but in other parts of the country there seems to be a prejudice against Pro Se's.”
I hear ya, but it’s Pro Per in State Court and Pro Se Federal. Plus the “prejudice” you speak of is here in some California courts too, I just experienced a related issue not long ago (under appeal, Judge was waaaay out of line with caselaw).
However why SOME (not all) judges have a bent against Pro Pers is because not many can draft a proper pleading, and the vast majority aren’t compliant with procedures. This makes the court’s job much harder, and judges have enough to worry about. But when a Pro Per (Pro Se in Federal Court) does in fact present a well founded case, properly pleaded and compliant with procedures? Whatever “prejudice” against Pro Per/Pro Se litigants may exist is quickly diminished.
No brag intended but I’ve had opposing counsel complain to me, that my pleadings are TOO thorough; more so than a lawyer would draft. Just my style I suppose, I prefer to overwhelm (usually with evidence) than understate. I’m ever conscious of Demurrer and Motions to Strike, general attack angles many Pro Pers overlook.
Correspondingly no one should think I’m not prepared to get a bloody nose or two, even knocked down hard, as the other guys do have defenses. The real questions of the week and beyond are; will the other guys attempt to exercise defenses and open up more cans of worm, or choose to take a more reasonable course (my preference) and consider a stipulated settlement? Time will tell, but please don’t think I’m not prepared to play in the mud -- and get a little soiled myself.
But hey litigation is similar to warfare; one shouldn’t engage the device, if not prepared to go the distance and get popped back a few times. As for me, you might tell I love a good scrap when fighting for the right reasons. But that’s the ONLY way I play. Otherwise, I’d be a bully.
Anon @ 5:08 PM:
”Be extremely careful about what you post here regarding your suit - particularly, anything that can be construed as statements to the effect that you are filing this suit for reasons other than to be ‘made whole’ by the defendant.”
I hear you too, but I believe I’ve made it perfectly clear through writing and the 6-30-07 Haterz podcast (repeatedly); I WANT THE MONEY Casey swindled me out of, justice, and redress for actionable conduct.
Now what you’re suggesting is an affirmative defense, something to be heard by a jury. Whereas my motivations are many only one of which to teach the little Fliptardian, some folk aren’t going to take his chit lying down. Nonetheless, I assure you, my complaint and causes of action have ample and abundant merit.
This IS NOT a frivolous action as Casey contends. Were that not so, why is he scared/nervous and clearly on the attack against me publicly? Yeah, Serin knows I’ve got the stake and resolve to drive it through his blood sucking heart... Vampira that he is. ;)
(Casey: the Transylvania two-step, ain’t getting ya outta this one!)
~Mark
BTC,
I didn't know he planned on filing the contract (or excerpts) with the complaint... If it's not in the complaint, Casey and Marty could string a lawyer along for weeks until they figure out the truth (although, if they do a Google search, they'd figure out they 1. would probably never be paid and 2. should or may withdraw from the case according to the MRPC).
I'm not sure what the procedure is in CA, but I hope that, if possible, LossMit included a demand to certify the collateral matters alleged in the complaint (mortgage fraud, etc.) to the DA's office for investigation. Win-Win™!
Dawg, so what's the next juicy bit?
My wife thinks I'm getting an online pr0n addiction. If only she knew..
~Taz
Some of you guys are as delusional as fliptard.
1. lossmitpro, marty, nigel swaby are all cut from the same shady scammer cloth as fliptard.
2. Galina is guilty. Attempts to pass her off as some "victim" are downright pathetic to the extreme.
3. Casey is probably on the next plane to uzbek. He aint comin back to face the music.
Anon @ 6:08 PM:
”Some of you guys are as delusional as fliptard.”
Bite me!
~Mark
(Sorry, couldn’t resist.)
@6:08 Anonymous
The only point you made with merit is #3.
@LMP
You said last night Marty is dodging your phone calls, perhaps he's avoiding service? I find it interesting you can't get in touch with him, and Casey is making comments that he's not sure what's happening with the book.
My opinion is Marty is getting ready to slip into the Vegas/Arizona night quietly, never to return under the name Marty Stewart, or he's already long gone.
That contract could put him in jail, you'd think he'd be trying to settle by now.
Nah, marty is a pro, he's going to stride into the court (chuckle) with a high powered law team (guffaw) and teach you all (bwahahahaha!) a lesson! (Gasping for air from laughing too hard)
See what you guys started last night? Anytime I hear the name marty, I go into uncontrollable laughter! "Back To The Future" is ruined for us forever!
@LossMitPro
I wonder if the case you are filing, and any related discovery could be used to help in Galina's separation order.
It might help her shift the 50% split.
Well mark you're the dumbass doing business with him and intertwining your business and your life with his.
@LossMitPro
Bite me!
Careful, that Anon is gay!! and just might!
@LMP
You don't know where that troll has been, put it down!
It could have been near Mocha!
@JohnnyB
Thank you - must have missed that bit of info along this adventure train.
It's quite suitable to the expression:
"One must lie in the bed that one has made"
Doesn't?
No I think casey already bit it off for him.
@Anon
How would you know? Are you interested in such thing? Does it turn you on? Did you check?
Mouse And Pencil @ 6:14 PM:
” You said last night Marty is dodging your phone calls, perhaps he's avoiding service?”
Well I haven’t left him any messages either, said in the interest of full disclosure (may have not mentioned that last night). But it ain’t no thang if big, bad, Mary.. Errr, Marty don’t want no service... I just go to publication. Done!
(Oh then the real action starts, effectuating the judgments.)
” You don't know where that troll has been... It could have been near Mocha!
YIKES!! (I take it back!)
@ Anon @ 6:21 PM
Well STOP playin with it and give the damn thing here!
~Mark
(Wondering when the Trolls will realize, they ain’t no THANG!)
No not at all, but seeing lmp is singing soprano it is not an unreasonable assumption.
@ Anon @ 6:28 PM
All the better able to BITCH slap then.
~Mark
(Too fun, group, gots to go thought. Bye Marty!)
@Anon
How would you know he is singing soprano? You had to be 'checking him out' to notice..
Admit it, admit your inner attraction!! Do it, yea DO IT.. you can come out of the closet!!
ONE HUNDRED AND MURST BITCHES.
Okay now to the next haterzcast.
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=34513&cmd=tc
Title: Indepence day Episode
Time: 07/03/07 07:30 PM EDT
Description: 4th of July Episode (on the 3rd--yah a day off-bite me)....This talkcast will be all about independence. Will Galina declare her independence from Casey? Will Nigel declare his indepence from pleather? Will Lost Mittens declare his indepence from long legal terms? Will Duane declare his indepence from 2 buck chuck? WIll BTC declare his indepence from wine? Will Annie declare her indepence from men? Will rob dawg finally call in? (doubt it..hes a haterzcast hater) All this and more on the Independence from Casey Serin Haterzcast. Fireworks to immedietly proceed after haterzcast is done.
Nigel? So why not call it a PLEATHERCAST?
I like "KOICAST".
Oh, and One hundred and thurst!
Hey Shark:
I declared my independence from men long ago.
I'm single and LOVING it.
I own my own place AND have a rental unit. (As snowflake would say, "sweet.")
I have my own 401(k) and IRA.
No one takes care of me - and I obey no one.
There are only a few benefits and reasons for having a man in my life - and one of those is to kill bugs.... but then I got a fly swatter, a can of raid and it's all good.
All I want is a nice piece of eye candy who will will cook and clean for me.
LOL
;-)
Yo Villasenor,
Since you claim to be such a hot shot legal genius pro per litigant, why not post some case numbers you have won that we can look up online?
At 7:03 PM, Annie said...
Hey Shark:
I declared my independence from men long ago.
I'm single and LOVING it.
----no your not...You want us on that wall, you need us on that wall.
I own my own place AND have a rental unit. (As snowflake would say, "sweet.")
-----HMMMMMM.....I need a sugarmomma.
I have my own 401(k) and IRA.
-----I hear casey is going to be single soon...he can help you invest that 401k and IRA.
No one takes care of me - and I obey no one.
---Guys..she's ripe for the plucking.
There are only a few benefits and reasons for having a man in my life - and one of those is to kill bugs.... but then I got a fly swatter, a can of raid and it's all good.
---some benefits for a woman too.....(censored) (censored) and (censored)
All I want is a nice piece of eye candy who will will cook and clean for me.
------pffffffft. Cook and clean.....do you want a man that wears a murse with an apron that says kiss the cook too.
@ Annie,
So a short duration marriage is out?
Rob- where's the new post?
And I have an electric insect swatter... bzzzzt bzzzzt...
And all the BBQ licences you could poke a stick at, too
Marriage of any kind is out.
Do love a good honeymoon without the wedding.
;-)
annie YOU GOT MAIL
Shark -
Mail back at ya.
Listened to the Haterzcast.
All that giggling as if this situation is hilarious. Makes it seem pretty sick if you ask me - is the motive to help Galina or to screw Casey?
Why are you discussing his sex life, Galina's sex life, gay manwhores etc etc etc? To me it just screams "sick".
LossMit - handle yourself with more dignity. I am an attorney and I wouldn't be doing the things you are doing if I was bringing an action.
Galina - if you are reading this, stay away from men for at least a year. Build a sense of self and establish your confidence. When you do get involved with someone, make sure they have no connection to this episode of your life. There are plenty of people out there who have never heard of Casey - that is the kind of man you want.
Be aware of who you are contacting and what you are getting involved in. Personally, I would suggest hiring a lawyer and staying clear of the online community.
Good luck,
Phil
G., Seriously,
I peripherally know a young lady Constitutional Scholar (Law review from the Shark School (Hastings)).
Last I heard from her, she was teaching Constitutional Law to Judges.
I expect her ascension to the Supreme Court within my lifetime (but I might be wrong).
I have no idea whether she will willing or available to further your cause. The Dawg has all the details if you wish to contact her.
Do love a good honeymoon without the wedding.
I can do that!
@ Annie,
By "short duration marriage" I was thinking of a 3 day weekend. No marriage license or any of that official stuff necessary. ;)
At 7:48 PM, Orson Buggy said...
I am first in line, Gentleman...
Wagga, that's right. Our mutual aquaintance could mow down a hedgerow of bois with murses and not break a nail. I'll think about it. This stuff is already growing into a career killer for some so it could equally be a career maker for the right person.
Okay guys --
I'm a one-eyed frizzy haired 60 year old 350 lb woman with six cats.
Still interested?
Send a photo of the cats, with names, please.
Annie this old bitty will take your rejects.
>> Our mutual aquaintance could mow down a hedgerow of bois with murses and not break a nail.
Judge Judy? :-p
j/k.
You're more intelligible than Mocha.
Judge "Judy" is clue free. Period.
That would be regarding the Constitution & every thing else.
But I don't watch TV either. QED
@ 7:03 PM, Annie said...
... and I obey no one.
LIAR! You live with a cat!
-btc
Yea...
and I lied about everything else too....
I have two eyes
I'm younger than 60
no frizz in my hair
and only live with one cat
But hey, this is the internet...
Any news on snowflake?
Looks like comments are being approved, slowly, on KC's site. Up to 189.
Guess he's found so many opportunities that he doesn't have time to moderate the blog.
@ 6:35 PM, CHJTS said...
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=34513&cmd=tc
... Will BTC declare his indepence from wine?
Never. Impossible!
But I also never drink on a work night. 5:30 am wake time and wine don't mix well at this point in my life.
I will, however, be happy to discuss today's posting on my blog, in which I ruminate about the similarities between Casey's debacle and the Enron collapse.
-btc
I'm bored and so I resorted to tormenting annie in emails.
I'm gonna go get a mocha...be back later.
@CHJTS
No.. DON'T get MOCHA.. please.. I beg of you!!
Annie, if you fail us, there is always Aspeth.
An aside: here's the comment from Effing Back Stabbers that presumably led to inclusion in Mark's complaint.
From what I hear/read Aspeth is a great catch for any man smart enough and fast enough to catch her.
Smart enough & fast enough for Aspeth, but prefer Annie!
So there!
Even if Annie doesn't have enough mogs.
Well, it's almost 9 pm on the left coast, so Annie and I are going to bed. Goodnight All!
Sleep tight everyone.....
;-)
Except for me...
Hey, Rob Dawg!
Slightly off the topic of Fliptard, but here's a link to a story via the Consumerist website about the Fed closing the barn door long after the entire stable's been emptied and the horses are mooning their owners.
Another aside: I can't find any comment by Whoever (also named in the complaint) on IAFF, but could Mark be referring to this comment on EN?
Mocha's comments on IAFF and elsewhere attacking LossMitPro are easy to find.
MITLOSSPRO:
If your claim is considered BS.. or without merit then you could very well be looking at costs (that's if Serin can afford a lawyer).
I am a Hater (early.. like months ago).
If Serin can afford a lawyer then he will motion you on your claims individually, and, demand costs.
Please upload your claim, affidavit, and exhibits so we can have a look at the real docs.. that would help.
Private conversation with Annie.
None of your Federal business.
Don't!
Stop!
Don't!
Stop!
Don't Stop! Don't Stop! Don't Stop!
Mmmmmmmmmm! Yeah!!!!!
@lawnmower 8:39, 8:58:
fo' shizzle?
What are the defamatory statements in those postings? I can't find a single statement that's both factual (non-opinion) and false. LMP had better talk to a lawyer to make sure he's not hit with sanctions.
But what do I know?
This being Sunday July first, I am wondering if there are still the "fireworks" to come on or about the fourth. I know that a portion of this related to LMP's suit but now I am wondering if there is truly any additional to follow. Does any one truly ave any confirmations as to KC's travel plans? If Mom is the one paying was she at least bright enough to get him a non-refundable one way ticket? Did Galina really file for a legalk separation? Is there really anya hope of criminial action being executed against little KC? I feel like saying stay tuned to that Bat channel.....Same time next week....Can I get some type of confirmation on anything? I'm a the sole supporting single parent of two with a full time W2 LOSER (note correct spelling) JOB? CAREER that's coming into my busy season can someone throw me a bone and let me know that my obsession here will a least be worth the wait and over soon???? Please :-)!!e iougwith a fu
At 9:08 PM, The Real Wagga™ said...
posted by the senior mog, not me
@Holiday inn
the last time i checked nothing could be both factual and false. I am getting old now though and it might be like how bad means good to the kids nowadays.
@Holiday Inn: fo' shizzle?
Dunno -- I was curious about the three explictly, if pseudonymously, named Does and that's all I could find that seemed relevant.
Only LMP knows for sure what he means, and he ain't saying (much) yet.
With my skeptic hat on: would it be churlish to raise the issue of the fair use restriction that LMP attempted to apply to his IAFF guest post? What was that all about?
@Penis Size:
"the last time i checked nothing could be both factual and false."
Huh? Your moniker is a perfect example of a statement that is factual and could be false (I haven't looked in Casey's pants, so I can't tell for sure that it's false). It's a statement of fact, not opinion, so you can answer with a yes or no whether it's true (Casey's actual penis size is either that or it isn't). Factual doesn't only mean true (although "true" is one meaning of the word--see http://www.thefreedictionary.com/factual).
But with my believer hat on: if the extract posted is representative, I fully believe LMP (and BTC) when he says the Casey/Marty contract is dynamite.
With my skeptic hat on: would it be churlish to raise the issue of the fair use restriction that LMP attempted to apply to his IAFF guest post? What was that all about?
Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me. That was pretty hilarious. Lost Mittens wants the law to support his wishes. Clearly it does not always do so. Or maybe he's Congress now. Fair use my nuts, bully. Nigel and Lost Mittens may change sides, but they are not absolved of their outrageous assertions. Lost Mittens is also on dubous ground for hosting the MP3's. Like a playground bully, it doesn't matter what the law is. He will misapply it when it suits him. What you gonna do? Sue?
Loved that film Pitch Black. Byline: "Fight Evil with Evil".
"would it be churlish to raise the issue of the fair use restriction that LMP attempted to apply to his IAFF guest post?"
I don't know what restriction that was. I'm guessing LMP attempted to restrict the use of his comment in the body of his post? I guess it depends on who was the copyright owner, which in turn depends on whether the host's terms of service modify the copyright law default that the author is the owner. If the comment author (i.e. LMP) is the owner (I doubt that, but it's conceivable), the answer depends on the terms of the license he granted by posting his comment. My Holiday Inn expertise and the facts available to me are not enough to even begin to answer your question.
@holiday inn: I don't know what restriction that was.
Oh, OK: old history.
LossMitPro's now-deleted guest post on IAFF asserted his copyright, which is fair enough, but also asserted that "Permission is required before fair use application."
"Permission is required before fair use application."
That's laughable on its face.
Holiday Inn @ 10:43 PM:
”That's laughable on its face.”
Yup, shore-nuff is... Unless I knew a little something you don’t. Which I suppose speaks volumes, depending on one’s point-of-view. ;)
~Mark
'Unless I knew a little something you don’t.'
Or what you think you know about fair use is wrong - which it is.
No one's permission is required to requote minor sections of any copyrighted material, particularly when engaged in public debate about the public actions of individuals.
This extends to NDAs, by the way, as long as the person doing the quoting is not covered by the NDA in question - there is no such thing as a blanket NDA. Unless you feel that a court ordered gag order is related to copyright law -
'A gag law is intended to limit freedom of the press, as by instituting censorship or restricting access to information. In the United States, a court can only order parties to a case not to comment on it; a court has no authority to stop unrelated reporters from reporting on a case. Most statutes which restrict what may be reported have generally been found unconstitutional and void.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gag_order
Or to quote from the public domain, the growth of which was the stated constitutional purpose of copyright, 'It Is A Tale Told By An Idiot, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing.' (Macbeth, Act V, Scene V)
Hard as it may be for you to grasp, we can mock anything you write here without your permission, either explicit or implicit, citing your own words.
It's all good.
Oh, I was tempted to call myself John Doe, because getting included in a legal action seemed like a barrel of laughs, but being called a founding father in your next potential legal action may at least bring a smile to any judge's day, before he dismisses the case.
BelowTheCrowd,
You probably won't see this, it is too far down, but I am amazed and apreciative of your 'contracr analysis' half way up.
I deal in contracts day in and day out, and when I read the one in question, that paragraph jumped out at me, but I did not know why, except that it was silly to admit that you had lost nearly half a mill in a prior deal to a new business contact, in writing.
Again, nice points re the intent and discovery vs the defense.
Can these people get any more shady and transparent to the Dawg pac, btc?
Post a Comment