LossMitPro has suggested that Mrs. S not be included in this mess. The reasoning is sound that absent any evidence she could very well be a victim. Evidence:The 11 credit cards in her name are maxed out.
Her name is on many of the loans.
Her name is or was on many of the deeds.
She is featured prominently in the fix'n'flip process right up until IAFF went live.
She lives in a community property State and has been attending finance classes off and on for 5 years.
"The $1000 Contract."
She knew, she benefited, she's liable. The plural of "anecdote" is not "data" but the sum total of all available information can be. The only scrap that says she is not involved is Casey. Like I said; s-crap. S for Serin.
274 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 274 of 274Two hundred and murst.
So what are you saying, Sharky? That hobbits can't be hot? You sir, are a middle-earth racist.
(Granted the foot hair thing can be a turnoff at first.)
@ R-Boy
Better yet, why would a van rental place advertise on IAFF?
I highly doubt anyone visiting IAFF will say "you know what, I was looking for a van rental place. Thanks Casey."
LossMitPro Stated:
> Really, well pray-tell,
> what “agenda” might that be?
> (Other than a desire for
> reasonably calculated truths to
> be discussed through this
> dialogue?) What would I possibly
> have to gain or lose by
> imparting the information I
> have?
Imparting the information, none. The "agenda" comment comes from offering to work pro-bono for a "stunning" woman. This may be from an honest belief that she is innocent of all this (check facts, she is not), but the tone suggets otherwise - others commented on this as well, specificaly the "if she were fat / ugly" comments and the "not letting you within 50 feet" comments.
If this was an honest desire to help, it was worded in a way I could only describe as "creepy".
I would love to see G's arrainment - but your honor, she can't be gulity, she's stunning! Her looks / personality have nothing to do with her guilt or innocence. We do not have all the facts, but we have enough - she is on title for at least the three CA properties and on the mortgage (in CA, that's mandatory). All properties listed as primary residence and all executed within a short time to hide the transactions from the other lenders. Casey has admitted to the morgage fraud on his site, Galina is equally guilty. Her best defence ("I didn't know") won't work - well established that ignorance of the law is not a valid defence.
> As to lawyers not operating
> on “impressions?” You’ve clearly
> never heard nor had to contend
> with the many Doctrines law that
> operate on presumption, yes,
> impressions.
Presumptions and impressions are two different things. A presumption of innoncence (until proven guilty) is established. An impression that someone is innocent has no legal standing.
That was my original point - You are not an attorney (and to be fair, you stated that - another poster misunderstood and credited you as one). Lawyers deal in facts, not in impressions. How you feel about a client does not get entered into the record. What your client did and said is.
If you have FACTS about the Serins, by all means, state them (ie. you can verify the credit card balances, verify toilet scrubbing, verify ANY item) - or (as Duane has done), provide information not previously available. I'd love to hear any factual information you have to offer.
LossMitPro Stated:
> Really, well pray-tell,
> what “agenda” might that be?
> (Other than a desire for
> reasonably calculated truths to
> be discussed through this
> dialogue?) What would I possibly
> have to gain or lose by
> imparting the information I
> have?
Imparting the information, none. The "agenda" comment comes from offering to work pro-bono for a "stunning" woman. This may be from an honest belief that she is innocent of all this (check facts, she is not), but the tone suggets otherwise - others commented on this as well, specificaly the "if she were fat / ugly" comments and the "not letting you within 50 feet" comments.
If this was an honest desire to help, it was worded in a way I could only describe as "creepy".
I would love to see G's arrainment - but your honor, she can't be gulity, she's stunning! Her looks / personality have nothing to do with her guilt or innocence. We do not have all the facts, but we have enough - she is on title for at least the three CA properties and on the mortgage (in CA, that's mandatory). All properties listed as primary residence and all executed within a short time to hide the transactions from the other lenders. Casey has admitted to the morgage fraud on his site, Galina is equally guilty. Her best defence ("I didn't know") won't work - well established that ignorance of the law is not a valid defence.
> As to lawyers not operating
> on “impressions?” You’ve clearly
> never heard nor had to contend
> with the many Doctrines law that
> operate on presumption, yes,
> impressions.
Presumptions and impressions are two different things. A presumption of innoncence (until proven guilty) is established. An impression that someone is innocent has no legal standing.
That was my original point - You are not an attorney (and to be fair, you stated that - another poster misunderstood and credited you as one). Lawyers deal in facts, not in impressions. How you feel about a client does not get entered into the record. What your client did and said is.
If you have FACTS about the Serins, by all means, state them (ie. you can verify the credit card balances, verify toilet scrubbing, verify ANY item) - or (as Duane has done), provide information not previously available. I'd love to hear any factual information you have to offer.
@Mozz -- either they think that any traffic to their site is good traffic, and/or they are trying to get better "organic" Google search results by increasing the overall number of links to their website.
flail forward:
"So what are you saying, Sharky? That hobbits can't be hot?"
I s'pose they can be, to dwarves, elves, gnomes and other hobbits.
It's like a German Shepherd or a Husky or a Boxer...they're attractive and in some cases,beautiful...but that doesn't mean I want to "do the nasty" with 'em in the kennel, though.
"You sir, are a middle-earth racist."
Hey, what can I say? I started on dirt-tracks, now I'm on the middle-earth circuit...I reckon I'll be on the Winston Cup team before too long.
My racist car will be sponsored by Countrywide no doubt.
Does anyone know if she actually signed the fraudulent mortgage documents? I know she filed quit claims on the titles, but I've never seen it confirmed that she was on the loans.
This is all academic, isn't it? If Casey hasn't gotten into any legal trouble yet, Galina sure isn't.
Oh, how I wished that McBeef troll had been right about Casey being arrested.
Are you saying that Galina Serin is both a midget and a Cyclops?
It's giving me the creeps.
@007,
Did she even know about the total magnitude of the debt? Casey says that he used her credit for fixing up the houses. As long as he continued to say that "itsallgood," make the minimum payments every month, and reassure her that everything would get paid in full as soon as the houses sold, she may not have panicked until her credit card debt approached about $30k. ($30k is about the amount he made on the first condo sale.)
Was she aware of the amount of debt in Casey's name? Given that their "no debt" agreement stipulates that he can't open more lines of credit without her knowledge, I'm guessing that he wasn't too forthcoming about the number of lines of credit he had, or the total amount he owed. He might have given her some vague handwaving estimates, or told her that he was able to meet the minimum payments, and blown off more detailed inquiries.
And since Casey was so disorganized that he needed months to assemble his bills to make the financial statement so he could estimate his debt, it's not as if that information was readily available to her. Many of his bills were being sent to the houses or to PO boxes rather than to Yulia's house - remember the picture he took of the overflowing mailbox at the house he hadn't visited in months? Even if she knew where to call, lenders wouldn't disclose balances or account numbers to a spouse who wasn't listed on the account.
Sure, maybe she should have pressed him harder to show where the money was flowing. Maybe he pulled cash advances and and let her believe they were legitimate income. Maybe he played the "Honey, don't you trust me?" card. Maybe he used the same stalling tactics that he brags about using with his other lenders.
It's possible that posting the screenshots of his bank account and/or his financial spreadsheet was the first clue she had that the debt was really out of control.
Snowfake's featured on Weird Daily:
http://www.weirddaily.com/?p=9127
The Chinese foot-binding article down page is fairly interesting.
There are public records showing Galina Serin transfering her title part to Casey Serin.
That means that her name was on it.
Mozatta said...
Does anyone else feel cheated by Dawg today? Only 1 chance of trying to be first/murst/etc.
Dawg, did we do something wrong? Are you mad? Please allow us to boost our egos by giving us the opportunity to stamp our firstness on a fresh post. Just to start. Patience?
1:37 PM
Anonymous said...
Hopefully Dawg is getting the next Duane post ready...hint hint...
Yes, yes, etc. You are all baaad dawgs. Bad, bad, bad. Rolled up newspapers and all that. Duane email chronology today. A San Buenaventura rant. A "special" Oxnard (city) butt whipping feturing a good friend coming over to the dark side. Immigration in Congress is still a close call. California is approaching a Casey moment where living off borrowing is no longer credible. Caltrans is asking for a spanking. There's a dozen emails that require a reply.. Another dozen that deserve and another dozen that politeness indicate. Still two roses to plant. Project "Outdoor Kitchen" iniitated. A nasty bit of Caltrans sins of omission. Riverpark news. The amazing auction news so soon in the cycle.
DUANE POST? STILL WAITING ON THAT POST FROM YESTERDAY?
The important question to ask is not whether Galina is hot, but does she where a thong.
DUANE POST? STILL WAITING ON THAT POST FROM YESTERDAY?
No need to shout. The narrative went up a day ago. The email is all that awaits. The next chapter is inbound. If the "tease" proves unbearable I suggest you contact the advertisers and complain that the blog is not a good venue for their ads.
Isn't this a lovely example of what you get being one of those old-fashioned, gracious, Christian, subservient wives - hooked up with a looser like Snowflake and financially dependent on an immoral idiot. Yep, women are better off when they know their place all right.
I'd shoot myself if I had to listen to his whiny monotone all day. Gah.
@Sszark
Everything you say could in fact be true, only Casey & Galina know for sure. I'm just saying there seems to be a vast incongruity between the person that LossMitPro portrays and the situation as we know it.
Any sane and rational person would pay closer attention to their finances. And my question pertains to when a sane and rational person would say enough is enough. For instance, lets say all the scenarios you've brought forth did exist. What would a sane and rational person's reaction have been once they did find out the entire story? I don't think it would have been, oh yeah lets continue down the same path for another 8 months or longer. Do you?
This blog and 90% of the posts at IAFF prove that point.
"I suggest you contact the advertisers and complain that the blog is not a good venue for their ads."
LOL. ; )
While I am sure some people like to kid around and pull each others chain, we need to remember, Rob does this on his own time, and I can guarantee you he puts in more time keeping everyone A) In the loop, B) Finding and posting some of the most hilarious photos ever (my favorite is Nigel Annoys the Dawgs..Classic).
If you dont like Dawgs time frame, feel free to start your own blog.
Again, not trying to start trouble, but respect the mans time.
hey.. previous post wasnt a 14235 thing... about 7 words disappeared when I hit send... WEIRD
anyway.. you get the message.. ease up on Dawg.. kidding or not
Well, this “gal” is the one scrubbing other people’s toilets to help make ends meet.
She is 'scrubbing' the toilets of a few family members so she can earn the money they are giving her and KC anyway. This is per KC's own words (if anyone believes those anymore). So it isn't like she is a REAL housekeeper working for Merry Maids or something. It is probably so she can keep her dignity in tact when asking for money. And, how much do you think she is earning under the table? Maybe a few hundred bucks a month, I doubt it even covers the Jamba Juice KC drinks.
Maybe she should work on Yulia's house a little. There is still garbage not taken out 25% of the time.
For the record, Galina is kind of hot, but nowhere near as hottt as the EN ladiez.
Does that mean me too? *swoons over flailing*
@ Akubi
I doubt Galina is a thonger. As a good Christian wifey she's probably more of a granny panty kind of girl. Then again based on the celibacy books in Casey's library photo, perhaps she's a chastity belter. That would explain why Casey told T that his huge debt hasn't affected things in the bedroom: there was never anything going on in there to begin with. (except napping)
For the record, Galina is kind of hot, but nowhere near as hottt as the EN ladiez.* **
* especially Mermaiden
** does not include RCS when he's trolling as a woman
Flailing,
I think your thong theory really works so I was mainly hoping to bring additional traffic to Exurban Nation with a thong thread:). However, I tend to doubt G wears a thong as well.
* especially Mermaiden
Yay! Nothing like getting the compliments I'm fishing for.
So we're all under the impression this latest blog post is for real? Am I the only one who thinks it sounds like a sales letter for a clickbank e-book? I think Mr Serin's been reading up on web marketing. We've got a clear deadline in the sales pitch (5/25). He's appealing to fear (if he doesn't raise $1K by Friday, my daily soap opera blog will be cut off!). We've got a clear call to action. Oh, and the countdown is a nice touch too.
Me thinks the witness signatures were blotted out, not for privacy reasons, but so we couldn't find the names of people who could possibly confirm or deny this story.
Does anyone else watch the Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes? Remember when the Lard Lad donut mascot came to life? Do you remember how they got rid of him? "Just don't look. Just don't look". Just quit going to his blog and giving him attention, and he'll go away.
Careful, I have Galina/thong image held in abayence for which there just isn't enough mind bleach in the world to scrub clean.
Duane, owe you an email, on loaction, back to the cammand chair soon.
Celibacy books? I just remember seeing a divorce book.
Just quit going to his blog and giving him attention, and he'll go away.
And give up the Haterz Society?
It's all good over at IAFF. Casey's feeling good after receiving hundreds of emails and a bunch of sponsers.
Dawg,
That should be fun.
And give up the Haterz Society?
There's more than Casey that this crowd hates. If anything we can all rally around a blue ball :)
Denise
Galina is pretty enough - not my type (I like bad-girl goth types or intelligent redheads), but she's attractive.
I'm a sucker for a sexy brain, so it's hard for me to judge - I live in California and I know CA is chock full of drop dead gorgeous women...but most of them don't interest me once they open their mouths.
I'll take sexy smart over looks every time.
And boy, do we have some sexy smart women here....
Instant commenting disabled. IAFF decline continues.
@007,
I agree; any sane and rational person would be checking every credit card statement and bill closely, especially if her partner had lied about his financial situation in the past.
And, yes, a sane and rational person would find it a deal-breaker to learn the entire story.
Unfortunately, a person who sincerely believes that divorce is only permissible in case of adultery or abuse doesn't have a lot of bargaining power when she figures out that he's lied to her yet again. She can nag him, plead with him, deny him intimacy, get her family to help, go to marriage counseling - but if he knows that separation isn't an option for her, he doesn't have to cooperate.
I think it's plausible that it might have taken her eight months* to figure out that he's simply not afraid of her "consequences."
_____
* And five foreclosures, and a trashed credit report, and having to leave school, and watching her partner beg for money on the internet...
I say we offer $1000 to have Galina do the next talkcast, with Casey out of the house.
I'm concerned that it takes 2-3 hours per day to help someone blog. Shouldn't that be 2-3 hours a WEEK?
Sounds like someone is going to be paying a lot of money for nuthin.
You gotta love how Snowflake "accidentally" mis-typed the URL for Housing Panic. Keith's $50 sure went to good use.
I must have missed the comments that "cross(ed) the line" or just don't understand where that line happens to be...
In fact I’m going to disable instant comments for now because some of you guys have been crossing the line…. I don’t have time to police it anymore and there has been a lot of bad stuff the fell through the cracks already.
There's that organic fist again...
At 2:35 PM, Sharky said...
Snowfake's featured on Weird Daily:
http://www.weirddaily.com/?p=9127
***********************************
He he he
I could not help but notice that Soem Dood also got a tiny plug in for Caseypedia also, eh?
I was a busy li'l boy for part of the morn, chatting it up on Casey-related sites... so, lessee...
Hmmm. Only four references on Google right now... but let's see what happens once the bot rolls through and everything is updated this time tomorrow...
http://tinyurl.com/29oldt
While we are galina bashing, her eyes are too small and too close together, as evidenced here:
Actually, under the Yulia entry at Caseypedia, someone took down the pic of her with Galina! all right, nevermind
A good sign that your post is utterly lame is when the first paragraph is dedicated to reminding your readers to read it.
On Friday we talked about the benefits of living in condos. If that got you interested be sure to read this article about three things every home buyer should know before they purchase a condo unit.
courtesy SLCRE
You gotta love how Snowflake "accidentally" mis-typed the URL for Housing Panic. Keith's $50 sure went to good use.
X-uber-nation. Thinks clever, comes off petty.
Casey must have attended the "Blog Like Swaby" bootcamp over the weekend.
Topics of study include:
1. Readers' commentary, and why it is unnecessary.
2. Algae; What is the cause?
3. Improving your life through Olympic Pin sales and leatherette
4. How to get an organic #1 Google rating for a transvestite picture of yourself.
5. How many BMWs could fit in my pool?
The little fucker banned me two days ago. I think he just doesn't like having the "dirt" (which is all true) presented on his blog for everyone to see.
@ Flailing:
"On Friday we talked about the benefits of living in condos."
Who do you suppose the "we" is?
The little fucker banned me two days ago. I think he just doesn't like having the "dirt" (which is all true) presented on his blog for everyone to see.
Which little fucker, Nigel or Casey? Either one would be funny.
I highly doubt Galina is even breaking a sweat cleaning houses. It's nowhere close to a real job. It's just Starbucks money for her.
What's keeping her from getting a W-2 job? The same thing as Casey - she's lazy.
How much of the past 6 years of her adult life has she spent working?
What's the longest she's kept a job?
She's a slacker just like Casey. Maybe even more of one than he is.
I have nothing to add, I just wanted to use my shiny new Blogger name.
My thong comments were really pulling in sweet traffic (didn't realize that until after the fact or would have avoided the magic word there). His blog is so boring without comments, why would anyone bother visiting?
Snowflake has four sponsors and a new "story" about his Sweet Deals... of course, they necessitated him disabling comments yet again, and he complains about Galina-talk. I think he is just jerking the few people who still go there like monkeys on a leash, hoping to gather clickz™ and eyeballz™...
I am not sure if I personally would want to interact with his sponsors or not; to me, it might indicate bad judgment or bad character to advertise with an admitted un-indicted business fraud, but that's just my opinion.
Serin sweet links:
info@quickestore.com
info@bandago.com
support@mixpal.com
bruce@brucedcollins.com
Because, akubi, it's all about him doncha know.
Casey said,
I need more help with comment moderation. My previous attempt to recruit moderators didn’t go over well. So I’m trying again. If you can help me out, please email me and tell me why you can be trusted to do this important job.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Important job? Moderating?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
::wipes tear::
This just gets better and better. The boy managed to pull a rabbit out of his ass on this one. :>
@ Mermaiden
little fucker = Casey
@ Swab Me
Actually, there was actually a we for once. R-Boy wrote a comment refuting his previous condo post, which Nigel promptly deleted and rehashed as today's post as his own material. Gotta love the Swab!
Important job? Moderating?
I wonder how much he is paying for such a high powered important job?
@ flailing
The fact that he banned you makes me smile. You must have really been getting to him. Possibly hitting too close to reality.
Now that that's out of my system....
Snowflake is making another error (but I am not surprised): yes, he's addressing the immediate problem of the $1K by Friday evening.
But he's got to pull all of that off EVERY WEEK.
Any takers on how long he'll manage to do this before his usual slack-assedness takes over?
Schnapps,
1 week max.
What akubi said.
He may make it this week, but he won't be able to pull a repeat.
@Sszark
One could argue the plausibility of Galina being in the dark all the time, and finally getting up the courage to do something after 8 months. I just don't think it is probable. I'll go with Occam's Razor on this one.
More than likely they are two slovenly, self-entitled brats without any real moral compass to guide either of them. However, a part of me wishes Galina might be the innocent bystander. Because I hate to think of there actually being a woman who knows all of what Casey is and does, and not being thoroughly repulsed by it.
I really feel for her if she is indeed boxed in a relationship that she feels she can't escape. Married to a man, and I use that term loosely, she can't be proud of or trust. But I'm not buying a ticket to that movie...sorry.
Anon @ 1:37 PM:
I hear ya, no worries. Perceptions on the Net can be distorted, but I assure you I’m not anything other than what I’ve stated.
”Mortgage Fraud Investigator @ 1:54 PM:
”LossMit Pro is far more articulate. I do have a problem with him touting himself as some sort of all knowing pro. This is the same guy that seems to think that corporations can file criminal charges????”
And you’re an “investigator?” Man if that’s the case, then you’d know I have never touted myself as an “all knowing” pro (a “professional” maybe, but not “all-knowing”). I’ll admit when in error and have consistently opened myself up for correction, should someone disagree with substance I may offer. As an “Investigator” surely you recognize the need for such, unless the courts you hail to have a pouch and hop repeatedly?
(Please don’t take offense, I’m just having some fun with you.)
Apparently are you trying to suggest that a corporation cannot be a victim of crime or that its directors cannot file a complaint criminally, with appropriate law enforcement, to redress misappropriation of corporate assets???
Follow along closely now.
Both Cal-state and Federal law consider a corporation in the same light as a human victim of crime. Both Cal-state and Federal law recognize the corporate right to be treated as a subject of crimes, in relation to criminally caused losses. Directors of a corporation can in deed seek law enforcement help with crimes, IN THE SCOPE AND CAPACITY OF THEIR CORPORATE FUNCTION(S). Hence; the corporation (itself, for all intent and purpose) seeks engagement of criminal complaint(s) through Law Enforcement personnel.
If you disagree, fine, although please provide some basis for your position other than slight and innuendo that I’m in error.
007 @ 1:56 PM:
”I would have been REALLY concerned around the $5K mark, but that's just me. I'm curious as to where you think this poised, deliberate, well mannered, rational, purposeful, sincere (all your adjectives) "lady" should have become aware of the gravity of her debt situation?”
Hard to say, and I’d be guessing with any express benchmark. Although, frankly, speaking strictly based on what I know thus far? I’d say Galina has been “concerned” about Casey’s spending and conduct for a long time, and went along hoping his actions would produce financial recovery results.
If you’ve never dealt personally with Casey, then you don’t realize how conceiving (sincerely committed to a course) he can be (hell-of-a-salesman, when he looks in the mirror). Ask Duane, who I am confident will agree.
Once again; the immediate above as to Galina is speculation on my part!
In any event, Double-O, I hear what you’re driving at but let’s look at the external factor (and I’m not defending Galina, just pointing out observations for sake of good conversation). People facing foreclosure act differently than you or I, they DON’T act rationally more times than not. Please, take my word for the latter; I’m not simply justifying a position.
I can advise a client to do this or that (simply task, send in a payment(s) they have to lender, for example -- problem solved), they may commit to engaging it, and sure enough it won’t get done. If you’re not accustomed to dealing with people in these situations, I can see where you’d get the wrong impression. Yet folks under foreclosure threat often act like mental midgets, and I’ve dealt with some very intelligent folk who’ve fallen on hard times (Doctors, Engineers, CPA’s, etc.). Even the brightest of people seem to consistently act like their brain took a vacay. So that bears an aspect on my perspectives, yet I respect your well-thought opinions.
Property Flopper @ 2:22 PM:
”Presumptions and impressions are two different things. A presumption of innoncence (until proven guilty) is established. An impression that someone is innocent has no legal standing.”
Oh I get it; you wish to play a semantically-challenged word game. Good luck with that. I don’t care to rehash ground already covered, thanks. Suffice it then, the term reasonable doubt (a human impression) likely has little affect in your world. And God bless you for it! :)
~Mark
Huh;
The Fliptard says someone is paying him for "blogging effectively"...the mind reels!
And he's begging for comment-mod-bots again.
Anyone fancy some sockpuppet volunteer work?
A "Christian" Woman would be very hard pressed to put her husband homeless in the street. That, G knows, is where KC would end up without her.
Or I guess he could move back in with his parents, but he would make it her fault, and she would accept the guilt.
If his own site is this creepy and buggy:
Large pic, will need to zoom
then what makes him (or others) think he is competent to do any design or activity on their site?
Scary.
Dang it, my link didn't work - 'course, I don't claim I have big-time web-skillz like Casey:
Casey's error messages
@ anonymous 4:30pm
Scary indeed!
Hey!
This post has too much shit to read. I gots to say 'uncle' and scroll to the bottom. If I post at EN in the future without cognizance of some of the info presented today, don't judge me.
Galina is the purple Power Ranger!
I once knew a "fallen" Mormon girl. Her husband was a slimy piece of crap who did nothing useful other than get her pregnant and saddle the two of them with debt. Eventually, I believe he went to jail for something or other leaving her with limited skills (fortunately she was pretty smart) and facing bankruptcy.
She divorced him when he went to jail and got custody of the kids.
Her "reward" for all this? Shunned by her whole family and most of her friends, who thought she should have stuck by him. Had to make it on her own.
I have no idea if Galina's background is quite as fucked up, but if it's anything similar, then she's completely and totally unprepared to face life on her own. Thus, Casey is able to take advantage of her.
And BTW, when things fell apart for my friend, she broke with EVERYTHING. Drank, smoked, did drugs, fucked everything that moved (male and female) and generally made up for the first 24 years of her life. Eventually settled down and did OK, but it took a while.
Virtually all the hookers I know come from similar backgrounds.
If this marriage comes unglued (which I believe will only happen after Galina has to suffer a far more intense degree of pain), then watch out world, becasue the "new" G will be on the prowl!
-btc
Now snowflake has banned all mention of wife including name or reference to prior article. Yet, his own links show "Galina this..." and "Galina that..." and "She can't take any more blah blah..."
What a looser.
Now I'm gonna go out of my way to mention her and dig up the real dirt, since he has been such an idiot about it.
You reap what you sow, foreclosure guy. How you liking being such a notable personality right about now?
Looks like you love talking about all your site referrals and big plans, but when it gets to what you actually do, or wife has done, suddenly you clam up. Well, the world isn't going to let you pick and chose only on your terms.
Galina Serin is very much part of the fraud.
She appears on several public records transfering title to her husband. So she sign on those federal loan mortgage docs with false information. False because of the occupation disclosure.
Galina Serin is preasuring Casey to keep her out of the spotlight as she is now scare that she will probably end up in Jail along with her husband.
Post a Comment